Literature DB >> 25239254

Assessment of outcomes in partial nephrectomy incorporating detailed functional analysis.

Toshio Takagi1, Maria C Mir1, Rebecca A Campbell1, Nidhi Sharma2, Erick M Remer3, Jianbo Li4, Sevag Demirjian1, Jihad H Kaouk1, Steven C Campbell5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess perioperative morbidity and margins after conventional clamped partial nephrectomy (PN) while also using volumetric analysis to differentiate the contributions of parenchymal volume loss and recovery from ischemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study analyzed 163 patients who underwent PN with appropriate studies to allow analysis of function and parenchymal mass specifically in the operated kidney. Recovery from ischemia (glomerular filtration rate saved/volume saved) would be 100% if all nephrons recovered from ischemia. Precision (postoperative parenchymal volume/predicted parenchymal volume, presuming loss of a 5-mm rim of parenchyma related to excision and reconstruction) reflects efforts to optimize the amount of vascularized parenchyma saved with the PN. Trifecta was defined as negative margins, no Clavien grade 3-5 or urologic complications, and both recovery ≥80% and precision ≥80%.
RESULTS: An open procedure was performed in 82 patients (50%), and 59 (36%) had a solitary kidney. Warm ischemia was used in 96 patients (59%). The RENAL nephrometry score (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor, and the location relative to polar lines) was intermediate in 74 (45%) and high complexity in 38 (23%). Median recovery from ischemia was 95% and was ≥80% in 143 patients (88%). Median precision of excision/reconstruction was 93% and was ≥80% in 138 patients (85%). All tumors had negative surgical margins. Perioperative complications occurred in 13 patients (9%). Trifecta was achieved in 113 patients (69%). Multivariable analysis identified solitary kidney as the only significant predictor of trifecta.
CONCLUSION: Given careful patient selection and commensurate surgical expertise, excellent outcomes can be obtained with conventional clamped PN. Analysis of parenchymal volumes is necessary to facilitate comprehensive evaluation of functional outcomes after PN, allowing differentiation of nephron loss vs failure to recover from ischemia.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239254     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures.

Authors:  Paolo Verze; Paolo Fedelini; Francesco Chiancone; Vito Cucchiara; Roberto La Rocca; Maurizio Fedelini; Clemente Meccariello; Alessandro Palmieri; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm in the context of guideline development: a contribution of healthcare research.

Authors:  Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Rauter; Daniel Baumunk; Frank Christoph; Frank König; Matthias May; Martin Schostak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes between T1a and T1b Renal Masses following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) with Minimum One Year Follow Up: Can RAPN for T1b Renal Masses Be Feasible?

Authors:  Dae Keun Kim; Lawrence H C Kim; Ali Abdel Raheem; Tae Young Shin; Ibrahim Alabdulaali; Young Eun Yoon; Woong Kyu Han; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.