Literature DB >> 25239196

Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.

Evan D Sheppard1, Zane Hyde1, Mason N Florence1, Gerald McGwin1, John S Kirchner1, Brent A Ponce2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown the need for improving the readability of many patient education materials to increase patient comprehension. This study's purpose was to determine the readability of foot and ankle patient education materials and to determine the extent readability can be improved. We hypothesized that the reading levels would be above the recommended guidelines and that decreasing the sentence length would also decrease the reading level of these patient educational materials.
METHODS: Patient education materials from online public sources were collected. The readability of these articles was assessed by a readability software program. The detailed instructions provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were then used as a guideline for performing edits to help improve the readability of selected articles. The most quantitative guideline, lowering all sentences to less than 15 words, was chosen to show the effect of following the NIH recommendations.
RESULTS: The reading levels of the sampled articles were above the sixth to seventh grade recommendations of the NIH. The MedlinePlus website, which is a part of the NIH website, had the lowest reading level (8.1). The articles edited had an average reduction of 1.41 grade levels, with the lowest reduction in the Medline articles of 0.65.
CONCLUSION: Providing detailed instructions to the authors writing these patient education articles and implementing editing techniques based on previous recommendations could lead to an improvement in the readability of patient education materials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides authors of patient education materials with simple editing techniques that will allow for the improvement in the readability of online patient educational materials. The improvement in readability will provide patients with more comprehendible education materials that can strengthen patient awareness of medical problems and treatments.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; foot; lower extremity; patient education material; readability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239196     DOI: 10.1177/1071100714550650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  M Daniel Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Patrick Betschart; Valentin Zumstein; Maico Bentivoglio; Daniel Engeler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  Jorge L Perez; Zachary A Mosher; Shawna L Watson; Evan D Sheppard; Eugene W Brabston; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Catherine C Nguyen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Ryan P Merkow
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  An analysis of the readability of patient information materials for common urological conditions.

Authors:  Katie Dalziel; Michael J Leveridge; Stephen S Steele; Jason P Izard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew M Williams; Kelly W Muir; Jullia A Rosdahl
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Kyphosis-Related Information On The Internet Is the Quality, Content and Readability Sufficient for the Patients?

Authors:  Anıl Agar; Adem Sahin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 9.  A Systematic Assessment of YouTube Content on Femoroacetabular Impingement: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Connor R Crutchfield; Jessie S Frank; Matthew J Anderson; David P Trofa; T Sean Lynch
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Readability assessment of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons patient brochures with suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  Adam P Schumaier; Rafael Kakazu; Chelsea E Minoughan; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-03-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.