Literature DB >> 25239185

Elaboration of a semi-automated algorithm for brain arteriovenous malformation segmentation: initial results.

Frédéric Clarençon1, Franck Maizeroi-Eugène, Damien Bresson, Flavien Maingreaud, Nader Sourour, Claude Couquet, David Ayoub, Jacques Chiras, Catherine Yardin, Charbel Mounayer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to distinguish the different components of a brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) on 3D rotational angiography (3D-RA) using a semi-automated segmentation algorithm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 3D-RA of 15 patients (8 males, 7 females; 14 supratentorial bAVMs, 1 infratentorial) were used to test the algorithm. Segmentation was performed in two steps: (1) nidus segmentation from propagation (vertical then horizontal) of tagging on the reference slice (i.e., the slice on which the nidus had the biggest surface); (2) contiguity propagation (based on density and variance) from tagging of arteries and veins distant from the nidus. Segmentation quality was evaluated by comparison with six frame/s DSA by two independent reviewers. Analysis of supraselective microcatheterisation was performed to dispel discrepancy.
RESULTS: Mean duration for bAVM segmentation was 64 ± 26 min. Quality of segmentation was evaluated as good or fair in 93% of cases. Segmentation had better results than six frame/s DSA for the depiction of a focal ectasia on the main draining vein and for the evaluation of the venous drainage pattern.
CONCLUSION: This segmentation algorithm is a promising tool that may help improve the understanding of bAVM angio-architecture, especially the venous drainage. KEY POINTS: • The segmentation algorithm allows for the distinction of the AVM's components • This algorithm helps to see the venous drainage of bAVMs more precisely • This algorithm may help to reduce the treatment-related complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239185     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3421-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  9 in total

1.  Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis.

Authors:  M Bock; S O Schoenberg; F Floemer; L R Schad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnitude subtraction vs. complex subtraction in dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR angiography: basic experiments and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  S Naganawa; T Ito; E Iwayama; H Fukatsu; T Ishiguchi; T Ishigaki; N Ichinose
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Segmentation of brain blood vessels using projections in 3-D CT angiography images.

Authors:  Danilo Babin; Ewout Vansteenkiste; Aleksandra Pizurica; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  Double-reference cross-correlation algorithm for separation of the arteries and veins from 3D MRA time series.

Authors:  Francesco Santini; Sunil Patil; Stephan Meckel; Klaus Scheffler; Stephan G Wetzel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Three-dimensional rotational angiography in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  X Combaz; O Levrier; J Moritz; J Mancini; J M Regis; J M Bartoli; N Girard
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.447

7.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; N A Martin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Angiographic architecture of intracranial vascular malformations and fistulas--pretherapeutic aspects.

Authors:  P Lasjaunias; C Manelfe; M Chiu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Computer-aided nidus segmentation and angiographic characterization of arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Nils Daniel Forkert; Till Illies; Einar Goebell; Jens Fiehler; Dennis Säring; Heinz Handels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.924

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Comment on "Aneurysms Associated with Brain Arteriovenous Malformations".

Authors:  F Clarençon; E Shotar; N-A Sourour
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Patterns of relapse and growth kinetics of surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas.

Authors:  Matthieu Peyre; Marc Zanello; Karima Mokhtari; Anne-Laure Boch; Laurent Capelle; Alexandre Carpentier; Stephane Clemenceau; Carine Karachi; Soledad Navarro; Aurelien Nouet; Vincent Reina; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Marc Sanson; Philippe Cornu; Michel Kalamarides
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Segmentation techniques of brain arteriovenous malformations for 3D visualization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elisa Colombo; Tim Fick; Giuseppe Esposito; Menno Germans; Luca Regli; Tristan van Doormaal
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Update Onyx embolization for plexiform arteriovenous malformation: Ante-grade drifting technique.

Authors:  Xianli Lv; Shikai Liang
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-16

5.  Analysis of the Expression of Angioarchitecture-related Factors in Patients with Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation.

Authors:  Guang-Zhong Chen; Yu Ke; Kun Qin; Meng-Qi Dong; Shao-Jian Zeng; Xiao-Feng Lin; Sheng-Quan Zhan; Kai Tang; Chao Peng; Xiao-Wen Ding; Dong Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.