Literature DB >> 25238659

The addition of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial.

Gülşah Aynaoğlu Yıldız1, Yavuz Emre Şükür2, Can Ateş3, Ruşen Aytaç2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of addition of different dosages of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) to routine luteal phase support (LPS) on implantation and pregnancy rates. STUDY
DESIGN: Three hundred infertile couples who were treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with long luteal GnRH agonist protocol were enrolled. All women received 600 mg/day vaginal micronized progesterone plus 4 mg 17β estradiol for LPS starting from the day of oocyte retrieval. Patients (n=300) were randomized into three treatment groups. Group A (n=100) received leuprolide acetate 1 mg s.c. injection 3 days after ET in addition to routine LPS. Group B (n=100) received two sequential doses of leuprolide acetate 1 mg s.c. injections 3 and 6 days after ET in addition to routine LPS. Control group (n=100) received only the routine LPS.
RESULTS: A total of 279 patients completed the study. The groups were comparable in terms of baseline demographic parameters including age, duration of infertility and day 3 levels of FSH and estradiol. The cycle parameters of the groups were also comparable regarding the E2 level on day of hCG, number of retrieved oocytes, number of day 3 embryos, number of embryos transferred, and endometrial thickness on both days of OPU and ET. The implantation rates were similar in between the Groups A, B, and control group (20.7% and 25.8% vs. 13.3%, respectively; P=.099). The clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates were similar in between the groups. The ongoing pregnancy rates were 27.4% in control group, 36% in Group A and 42.9% in Group B (P=.093). The OHSS rates were comparable in between the groups. The multiple pregnancy rates were significantly higher in Groups A and B than in control group (12% and 17.9% vs. 4.2%, respectively; P=.014).
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates seem to be increased with the addition of GnRH-a to routine luteal phase support.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pregnancy rate; GnRH agonist; Implantation rate; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Luteal phase support

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238659     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  12 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

2.  Administration effects of single-dose GnRH agonist for luteal support in females undertaking IVF/ICSI cycles: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mengling Song; Chunlian Liu; Rong Hu; Feimiao Wang; Zhenghao Huo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Addition of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist for luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization: an analysis of 2739 cycles.

Authors:  Erhan Şimşek; Esra Bulgan Kılıçdağ; Pınar Çağlar Aytaç; Gonca Çoban; Seda Yüksel Şimşek; Tayfun Çok; Bülent Haydardedeoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Effects of multiple doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on the luteal-phase support in assisted reproductive cycles: A clinical trial study.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Maryam Mirzaei; Esmat Mangoli; Yasamin Mehrolhasani
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-08-16

5.  Single-Dose Versus Multiple-Dose GnRH Agonist for Luteal-Phase Support in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yanzhi Wu; Zhengmei Pan; Fangjie Jiang; Youhui Lu; Yushi Meng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support-Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Céline Pirard; Ernest Loumaye; Pascale Laurent; Christine Wyns
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissues following GnRH agonist treatment in a mouse adenomyosis model.

Authors:  Song Guo; Xiaowei Lu; Ruihuan Gu; Di Zhang; Yijuan Sun; Yun Feng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 8.  Clinical pregnancy following GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of fresh or frozen assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Le Thi Minh Chau; Duong Khue Tu; Philippe Lehert; Do Van Dung; Le Quang Thanh; Vo Minh Tuan
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-13

9.  Effects of single dose GnRH agonist as luteal support on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: an RCT.

Authors:  Robab Davar; Maryam Farid Mojtahedi; Sepideh Miraj
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-08

10.  Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Christos A Venetis; Human M Fatemi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Robert Fischer; Yulia Koloda; Marcos Horton; Michael Grynberg; Salvatore Longobardi; Sandro C Esteves; Sesh K Sunkara; Yuan Li; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.