| Literature DB >> 25238316 |
Brett K Hayes1, Guy E Hawkins2, Ben R Newell2, Martina Pasqualino2, Bob Rehder3.
Abstract
Two studies examined a novel prediction of the causal Bayes net approach to judgments under uncertainty, namely that causal knowledge affects the interpretation of statistical evidence obtained over multiple observations. Participants estimated the conditional probability of an uncertain event (breast cancer) given information about the base rate, hit rate (probability of a positive mammogram given cancer) and false positive rate (probability of a positive mammogram in the absence of cancer). Conditional probability estimates were made after observing one or two positive mammograms. Participants exhibited a causal stability effect: there was a smaller increase in estimates of the probability of cancer over multiple positive mammograms when a causal explanation of false positives was provided. This was the case when the judgments were made by different participants (Experiment 1) or by the same participants (Experiment 2). These results show that identical patterns of observed events can lead to different estimates of event probability depending on beliefs about the generative causes of the observations.Entities:
Keywords: Bayes nets; Causal models; Intuitive statistics; Judgment under uncertainty
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25238316 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cognition ISSN: 0010-0277