Literature DB >> 25237934

Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees.

Evert W Brascamp, Piter Bijma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficient methodologies based on animal models are widely used to estimate breeding values in farm animals. These methods are not applicable in honey bees because of their mode of reproduction. Observations are recorded on colonies, which consist of a single queen and thousands of workers that descended from the queen mated to 10 to 20 drones. Drones are haploid and sperms are copies of a drone's genotype. As a consequence, Mendelian sampling terms of full-sibs are correlated, such that the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms is not diagonal.
RESULTS: In this paper, we show how the numerator relationship matrix and its inverse can be obtained for honey bee populations. We present algorithms to derive the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms that accounts for correlated terms. The resulting matrix is a block-diagonal matrix, with a small block for each full-sib family, and is easy to invert numerically. The method allows incorporating the within-colony distribution of progeny from drone-producing queens and drones, such that estimates of breeding values weigh information from relatives appropriately. Simulation shows that the resulting estimated breeding values are unbiased predictors of true breeding values. Benefits for response to selection, compared to an existing approximate method, appear to be limited (~5%). Benefits may however be greater when estimating genetic parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: This work shows how the relationship matrix and its inverse can be developed for honey bee populations, and used to estimate breeding values and variance components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25237934      PMCID: PMC4168193          DOI: 10.1186/s12711-014-0053-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


  6 in total

1.  A fast algorithm for computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations.

Authors:  M Sargolzaei; H Iwaisaki; J-J Colleau
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis.

Authors:  Jaboury Ghazoul
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Analysing gametic variation with an animal model.

Authors:  B Tier; J Sölkner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Efficient selection rules to increase non-linear merit: application in mate selection.

Authors:  S Smith; F Allaire
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 5.  Biology and control of Varroa destructor.

Authors:  Peter Rosenkranz; Pia Aumeier; Bettina Ziegelmann
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Male fitness of honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  F B Kraus; P Neumann; H Scharpenberg; J van Praagh; R F A Moritz
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Short-term effects of controlled mating and selection on the genetic variance of honeybee populations.

Authors:  Manuel Du; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Comparison of infinitesimal and finite locus models for long-term breeding simulations with direct and maternal effects at the example of honeybees.

Authors:  Manuel Plate; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A note on genetic parameters and accuracy of estimated breeding values in honey bees.

Authors:  Evert W Brascamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding.

Authors:  Manuel Plate; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 5.  Advances and perspectives in selecting resistance traits against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees.

Authors:  Matthieu Guichard; Vincent Dietemann; Markus Neuditschko; Benjamin Dainat
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Substantial Genetic Progress in the International Apis mellifera carnica Population Since the Implementation of Genetic Evaluation.

Authors:  Andreas Hoppe; Manuel Du; Richard Bernstein; Friedrich-Karl Tiesler; Martin Kärcher; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Exploring Two Honey Bee Traits for Improving Resistance Against Varroa destructor: Development and Genetic Evaluation.

Authors:  Matthieu Guichard; Benoît Droz; Evert W Brascamp; Adrien von Virag; Markus Neuditschko; Benjamin Dainat
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.

Authors:  Richard Bernstein; Manuel Du; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.

Authors:  Manuel Du; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.