Literature DB >> 25237669

Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.

Felix L Guljé, Gerry M Raghoebar, Arjan Vissink, Henny J A Meijer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess the clinical performance of single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm or 11-mm implants combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 41 consecutive patients with one missing premolar or molar in the posterior maxilla and with an estimated bone height of 6 to 8 mm in that area were included. Each patient was randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups, namely to receive an 11-mm implant (Osseo Speed 4.0 S, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden) in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery or to receive a 6-mm implant (Osseo Speed 4.0 S) without any grafting. After a 3-month osseointegration period, all implants were restored with custom-made titanium abutments and cemented zirconia-based porcelain crowns. Outcome measures were: implant survival; radiographic bone changes; plaque accumulation; bleeding tendency; peri-implant inflammation; presence of dental calculus; biological and technical complications; and patients' satisfaction. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at placement of the crown and 12 months thereafter. Patients' satisfaction was scored before treatment and after 12 months of functioning of the crown.
RESULTS: One patient of the 11 mm implant group died during the follow-up. No implant failed and no biological or technical complications occurred. From loading to the 12 months follow-up, no difference was found in mean marginal bone changes between the groups (bone resorption in both groups 0.1 ± 0.3 mm). Clinical items revealed very healthy peri-implant soft tissues in both groups. Patients' satisfaction scores were high in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 6-mm implants and 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery are equally successful to support a single crown in the resorbed posterior maxilla after 1-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25237669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  14 in total

Review 1.  Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan A V Palacios; Jaime Jiménez Garcia; João M M Caramês; Marc Quirynen; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Toledano; Enrique Fernández-Romero; Cristina Vallecillo; Raquel Toledano; María T Osorio; Marta Vallecillo-Rivas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.

Authors:  Miaozhen Wang; Feng Liu; Christian Ulm; Huidan Shen; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Stock Versus CAD/CAM Customized Zirconia Implant Abutments - Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ulf Schepke; Henny J A Meijer; Wouter Kerdijk; Gerry M Raghoebar; Marco Cune
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Mauro Marincola; Giovanni Corrocher; Miguel Simancas-Pallares; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-02

Review 6.  Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone.

Authors:  Daniel Stefan Thoma; Jae-Kook Cha; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Shi; Ying-Xin Gu; Shi-Chong Qiao; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Henny J A Meijer; Carina Boven; Konstantina Delli; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.