| Literature DB >> 25237594 |
Cláudia I Lima-Bittencourt1, Patrícia S Costa1, Mariana P Reis1, Alexandre B Santos1, Francisco A R Barbosa1, Jean L Valentin2, Fabiano L Thompson2, Edmar Chartone-Souza1, Andréa M A Nascimento1.
Abstract
Due to the importance of heterotrophic bacteria in biogeochemical cycles and their influence on water quality, many studies have assessed the composition of the bacterial community. Most of these were made in temperate freshwaters. Eighteen heterotrophic bacteria communities distributed over time and space in the water column of Carioca Lake, not exposed to anthropogenic activities, were analyzed to characterize their composition. A polyphasic approach was used, including 16S rDNA restriction analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, BIOLOG Ecoplates and statistical methods. The physiological profiles among the 18 microbial communities were diverse. Clustering analysis and the metabolic fingerprint of the Biolog Ecoplate(TM) system data separated the communities based on temporal scale. A set of 673 isolates were recovered on high nutrient medium. The 673 isolates obtained yielded 360 Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis (ARDRA) Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). Most (313) of the ARDRA patterns, OTUs, were from isolates obtained in a single sampling point, in temporal and spatial scales, indicating changes in the bacterial community. A subset of representative isolates for each ARDRA OTU was identified by 16S rRNA gene fragment sequencing and categorized into five phyla, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Deinococcus-Thermus, represented by 38 genera. The results of this work contribute to a better understanding about the phylogeny of tropical freshwater heterotrophic bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteria; 16S rRNA; Tropical freshwater lake
Year: 2014 PMID: 25237594 PMCID: PMC4157234 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Environmental parameters obtained in the water column from Carioca Lake in 2007.
| Environmental parameters | Sample period | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June | August | |||||
| Light penetration | 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% |
| Depth (m) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1.5 | 4.5 |
| pH | 7.3 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 7.3 |
| Temperature (°C) | 23 | 22.4 | 22 | 23.6 | 23 | 21.6 |
| Turbidity (NTU) | 7 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| DO (mg L−1) | 9.1 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 6.8 |
| TP (µg/L) | 18.1 | 19.1 | 25.6 | 25.4 | 26.8 | 34.6 |
| 1.2 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 1.9 | ND | 3.9 | |
| TN (µg/l) | 370.9 | 354.7 | 404.5 | 201.4 | 221.6 | 365.6 |
| 121.9 | 114.6 | 112.7 | 43.1 | 41.6 | 22.8 | |
| 32.2 | 38.5 | 32.2 | 30.1 | 47.6 | 43.5 | |
| 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 1.4 | |
| Chlorophyll | 55.1 | 58.8 | 62 | 25.7 | 32.6 | 96.6 |
Notes.
dissolved oxygen concentration
total phosphorus
soluble reactive phosphorus
total nitrogen
ammonium
nitrite
nitrate
Carbon source utilization by bacterial communities from Carioca Lake and average well-color development (AWCD), richness (R), Shannon-Weaver index (H′) and evenness (E) calculated on carbon substrate used in Ecoplate.
| Carbon sources | Sites sampled | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June | August | |||||||||||||||||
| Lim A | Lim B | Lim C | Lim A | Lim B | Lim C | |||||||||||||
| 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% | 100% | 10% | 1% | |
| Pyruvic Acid Methyl Ester | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tween 40 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tween 80 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Ciclodextrin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Glycogen | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Cellobiose | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| D-Xylose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| I-Erythritol | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| D-Mannitol | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Glucosaminic Acid | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| Glucose-1-Phosphate | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D,L- | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Galactonic Acid | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Galacturonic Acid | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| 2-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 4-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | |
| Itaconic Acid | − | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| D-Malic Acid | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| L-Arginine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-Asparagine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| LPhenylalanine | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-Serine | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| L-Threonine | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Glycyl-LGlutamic Acid | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenylethylamine | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| Putrescine | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
| 23 | 20 | 24 | 20 | 19 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 28 | 29 | 28 | 25 | 30 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 28 |
|
| 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2.97 | 2.92 | 3.05 | 2.86 | 2.60 | 2.96 | 2.98 | 2.97 | 3.03 | 3.18 | 3.28 | 3.17 | 3.07 | 3.33 | 3.11 | 3.15 | 3.18 | 3.19 | |
|
| 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
Figure 1UPGMA cluster analysis of microbial communities based on metabolic diversity.
UPGMA (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages) cluster analysis of microbial communities based on metabolic diversity obtained through BIOLOG Ecoplates after incubation at 28 °C for 72 h.
Figure 2Correspondence analysis.
Projection of substrates and samples on the 1–2 factorial plane. In blue the substrates and in red the sampling points.
Figure 3Rarefaction curves for each bacterial community based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences.
C, coverage. (A) bacterial communities from June; (B) bacterial communities from August.
Spatial distribution ARDRA OTUs and statistical diversity of bacterial isolates communities.
| Euphotic and Horizontal | Number of | Number of | ARDRA OTUs repeated between: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euphotic and | Month of | |||
| LimA-100-J | 36 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| LimA-10-J | 37 | 22 | 6 | 2 |
| LimA-1-J | 49 | 35 | 1 | 0 |
| LimB-100-J | 44 | 26 | 0 | 2 |
| LimB-10-J | 38 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
| LimB-1-J | 27 | 19 | 1 | 0 |
| LimC-100-J | 29 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
| LimC-10-J | 22 | 13 | 2 | 2 |
| LimC-1-J | 31 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| LimA-100-A | 36 | 12 | 7 | 0 |
| LimA-10-A | 49 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
| LimA-1-A | 43 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
| LimB-100-A | 40 | 13 | 6 | 0 |
| LimB-10-A | 35 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| LimB-1-A | 38 | 22 | 1 | 0 |
| LimC-100-A | 39 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
| LimC-10-A | 47 | 11 | 2 | 0 |
| LimC-1-A | 33 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 673 | 313 | 34 | 13 |
Notes.
Operational Taxonomic Units
Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis
Limnetic zone
The numbers 1, 10 and 100 correspond to light penetration (1%, 10% and 100%) as determined by Secchi disk.
The letters A, B and C correspond to each point of the limnetic zone that the isolates were recovered.
The letters J and A correspond to month of collection (J for June and A for August).
Figure 4Relative abundance of phyla in Carioca Lake based on sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene.
Figure 5Relative abundance of genera in Carioca Lake based on sequence analyses of the 16S rRNA gene.
(A) bacterial communities from June; (B) bacterial communities from August.
Figure 6UPGMA (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages) dendrogram generated by UniFrac of isolates from 18 bacterial communities from Carioca Lake.
Figure 7Correspondence analysis.
Projection of bacteria and samples on the 1–2 factorial plane. The samples are in red, the genera are in blue. (LimB-1-A sample was excluded—see text).