K Shimomura1, T Kanamoto1, K Kita1, Y Akamine1, N Nakamura2, T Mae1, H Yoshikawa1, K Nakata3. 1. Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. 2. Osaka Health Science University, Department of Rehabilitation Science, 1-9-27 Tenma, Kita-ku, Osaka City, Osaka 530-0043, Japan. 3. Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Health and Sport Sciences, 1-17 Machikaneyamacho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan.
Analysis of molecular mechanism of osteoarthritis (OA) developmentAnalysis of mechanotransduction in OA developmentFunction of synovial fibroblast in OA developmentCyclic compressive loading on a 3D cultured construct of human
fibroblasts upregulated PGE2 via COX-2 productionCyclic compressive loading upregulated interleukin-6 (IL-6) and
IL-8 proteinsThe expression of these molecules was upregulated without IL-1β and/or
tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α stimulationStrengths - our 3D culture system is close to intra-articular
environmentOur system could be useful in revealing the molecular mechanism
of mechanical stressLimitation - the intracellular signal transductions of PGE2,
IL-6 and IL-8 (mechanotransduction) have not been clarified
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease that causes joint pain,
deformity and functional disability, and is increasingly prevalent
in hundreds of millions of people worldwide.[1] Congenital disorders, obesity, labour,
sports, malalignment and joint instability may initiate processes leading
to loss of cartilage. In addition, repeated excessive mechanical
stress on the synovial joint, which is composed of cartilage and
synovium, is considered to be a key factor in OA development. However,
the molecular relationship between mechanical stress and OA development
is still unclear.OA involves a variable degree of synovitis, and these inflammations
cause many symptoms including joint swelling and effusion in clinical
situations.[2-6] Synovial fibroblasts
and macrophages, as well as chondrocytes, play an important role
in OA development through synovitis, and synovial macrophages are
considered to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β)
and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α).[6-10] These cytokines
stimulate synovial fibroblasts and chondrocytes to produce other
cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-8, and several enzymes, such as matrix
metalloproteinases (MMPs) and aggrecanases (ADAMTSs). These enzymes
sever type II collagen and proteoglycan, the principal components of
the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage.[11-15] In addition, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)
plays a significant role in OA by causing pain, inflammation, and
cartilage degradation.[16-18] Although PGE2
is known to be produced by synovial fibroblasts or chondrocytes
in response to IL-1β and/or TNF-α, which is produced by synovial
macrophages,[19-21] the molecular
mechanism of PGE2 production triggered by mechanical stress is still
unclear.We have developed a novel three-dimensional (3D) culture system
using cyclic mechanical stress on synovial cells or chondrocytes
for revealing the molecular mechanism of OA development resulting
from mechanical stress. In particular, we have focused on synovial
cells, which play an important role in OA development as mentioned
above. In our previous study, we have shown that cyclic mechanical
stress on 3D cultured constructs of human synovial fibroblasts upregulated
mRNA levels of MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13, ADAMTS4, and ADAMTS5
genes in a load-dependent manner[22-23] however, the induction of
PGE2 as a result of mechanical stress has not been investigated.
In the PGE2 synthesis pathway, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and microsomal
prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) are key enzymes that metabolise
arachidonic acid to PGE2.[24,25] Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) and steroids, which downregulate PGE2 synthesis through
inhibition of COX-2 activity, have been widely used in the treatment
of OA.[19]The purpose of this study was to examine the expression of PGE2
and the related cytokine expressions of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8
by cyclic compressive loading on 3D cultured constructs of human
synovial fibroblasts and to clarify the effects of NSAIDs and steroids
using our in vitro OAmodel.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture of primary human synovial
fibroblasts
Human synovial membranes were obtained aseptically from eight
patients aged from 17 to 34 years (three male, five female) who
underwent arthroscopic knee surgery in accordance with a protocol
approved by the Osaka University Institutional Ethical Committee.
We followed the Helsinki Declaration and obtained written informed
consent from all the patients involved in this study. The cell isolation
protocol was essentially the same as the protocol used previously
for the isolation of human synovial fibroblasts.[22,26] In brief, synovial membrane specimens were
rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), minced meticulously
and digested with 0.4% collagenase XI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,
Missouri) for two hours at 37°C. After neutralisation of the collagenase
with a growth medium containing high-glucose Dulbecco’s Modified
Eagle’s Medium (HG-DMEM, Wako, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, Utah) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco
BRL, Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, California), the cells were
collected by centrifugation, washed with PBS, resuspended in a growth
medium, and plated in culture dishes. For expansion, cells were
cultured in the growth medium at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere
of 5% CO2. The medium was replaced once a week. After ten
to 14 days of primary culture, when the cells reached near confluence,
they were washed twice with PBS, harvested by treatment with trypsin-EDTA
(0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA; Gibco BRL, Life Technologies Inc.),
and replated at 1:3 dilution for the first subculture. Cell passages
were continued in the same manner with 1:3 dilution when cultures
reached near confluence. Cells at passages 3 to 7 were used in the
present study.
Cell seeding on collagen scaffold
and production of the 3D engineered construct
The primary cultured cells were harvested and seeded on collagen
scaffolds to produce 3D constructs as previously described.[22,23] In brief, the cultured cells (5
× 105/scaffold) were suspended in a growth medium and
then mixed with an equal volume of 1% Atelocollagen gel (Koken,
Tokyo, Japan) on ice to produce a cell suspension in 0.5% collagen
solution. The cell suspension was incorporated into collagen scaffolds
(Atelocollagen Sponge Mighty, Koken, Tokyo, Japan; 5 mm diameter,
3 mm thick) by centrifugation at 500 × g for five minutes. The collagen
scaffold which we used has an interconnected pore size of 30 nm
to 200 nm. The scaffolds were fabricated via the process of freeze-drying
of 10% collagen gel and cross-linking to reinforce the mechanical
property. This is similar to those of articular cartilage. The cell–scaffold
constructs were then incubated at 37°C for gelation to produce 3D
cell–scaffold constructs (Fig. 1a). The cells in the 3D construct
were evenly embedded in the collagen scaffold, with no cell leakage
and collagen breakage after cell seeding, as we have previously
shown with histological evaluation.[22] The constructs were maintained in
a growth medium of HG-DMEM, with 10% FBS in free-swelling conditions
at 37°C and in 5% CO2 for three days prior to the application
of cyclic load stimulation.Figure 1a – 3D cell–scaffold
constructs made using collagen scaffolds (AtelloCell, MIGHTY); b)
monitor and controller; c) Cyclic load stimulater (CLS-5J-Z, Technoview,
Osaka, Japan) in the incubator; d) Schematic representation of the
cyclic load stimulator, cyclic-loaded samples, and unloaded samples;
e) Experimental protocol for cyclic compressive loading on 3D constructs.
Cyclic compressive loading on 3D
constructs
Cyclic unconfined compressive loading was applied to the 3D constructs
using a custom-designed apparatus, a cyclic load bioreactor (CLS-5J-Z,
Technoview, Osaka, Japan), as previously described (Figs 1b to 1d).[23] In brief, the
loading experiments were performed with metal platens and plastic
culture dishes in HG-DMEM and 10% FBS in a humidified incubator
maintained at a temperature of 37°C in 5% CO2 . In all
of these experiments, a cyclic compressive load of 40 kPa was applied
to the constructs for one hour at the rate of 0.5 Hz, in accordance
with the protocol used previously, in order to detect the expression
of PGE2, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α more easily.[22,23] As mentioned above, a cyclic compressive
load of 40 kPa was chosen, which yielded a 10% compression strain
(approximately), because it maximally induced the mRNA expression
of MMP1, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13 genes compared with the lower compressive
loading of 0 kPa or 20 kPa in our previous study.[22] In addition, we
measured the expression of PGE2 and the related cytokine expressions
six hours after cyclic loading according to our previous study,
in which the expression of MMPs maximally upregulated at this time.[22]
Experimental design
The experimental design is illustrated in Fig. 1e. On day 0,
the primary cultured human synovial fibroblasts were harvested,
seeded on collagen scaffolds, and maintained in growth media for
three days in free-swelling conditions. For the first experiment,
on day three, cyclic compressive loading was applied to the 3D constructs
for one hour. 3D constructs without loading were considered to be
the control. After six hours, culture supernatant was collected,
and the concentrations of PGE2, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 were
measured with the homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) method
(described below in detail). In addition, the mRNA expression of
COX-2 and mPGES-1 genes were quantitatively measured using a real-time
polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In contrast to the cyclic loading, 10 ng/ml
of IL-1β (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) or 100 ng/ml
of TNF-α (R&D Systems) was administered to the unloaded 3D constructs
on day three. A total of six hours after the administration of these
cytokines, the concentration of PGE2 in culture supernatant was measured
using HTRF. For the second experiment, cyclic compressive loading
was applied to the 3D constructs with or without two types of COX-2
inhibitors: COX-2 selective inhibitor (celecoxib, provided by Pfizer
Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) or dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich). These
drugs were administered just before cyclic compressive loading was
applied. Six hours after cyclic loading, the concentrations of PGE2,
IL-6 and IL-8 in culture supernatant were measured using HTRF. In
addition, the mRNA expression of the COX-2 gene was quantitatively estimated
by real-time PCR.
Quantitative protein analysis of
culture supernatant using HTRF
For each culture supernatant sample, an enzyme immunoassay was
performed to measure the concentrations of PGE2, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6
and IL-8 using HTRF humanPGE2, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 assay
kits (CIS Bio International, Saclay, France).
Quantitative mRNA expression analysis
of COX-2 and mPGES-1 genes
Total RNAs from the 3D constructs were extracted using a RNeasy
mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California). Complementary DNAs (cDNAs)
were obtained by the use of a reverse transcription (RT) of 200
µg of total RNA through the use of a reverse transcription system
(Promega, San Luis Obispo, California) with random primers. For
the quantification of gene expression, PCR amplification was performed
with SYBR Premix ExTaq (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) on a LightCycler
1.5 real-time PCR system (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana). RNA expression
levels were normalised to that of GAPDH. The primers used were as
follows: humanGAPDH (forward): TCT CTG CTC CTC CTG TTC GAC, (reverse):
GTT GAC TCC GAC CTT CAC CTT C, humanCOX-2 (forward): AGG GTT GCT
GGT GGT AGG AA, (reverse): GGT CAA TGG AAG CCT GTG ATA CT, humanmPGES-1 (forward): CCT GGG CTT CGT CTA CTC CTT, (reverse): AGT GCA
TCC AGG CGA CAA A.
Statistical analysis
Every experiment was performed more than three times using independent
donors. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by post hoc testing (> 2 groups).
The comparison of other parameters was analysed with a Mann–Whitney
U test (two groups). The results are presented as mean and sd. The
data were analysed with JMP 9 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina)
and significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
The expressions of PGE2 and related
molecules by cyclic compressive loading
The concentrations of PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 in a culture supernatant
of loaded samples were significantly higher compared with that of
unloaded samples (PGE2, 0.33 ng/ml (sd 0.055) vs 2.07
ng/ml (sd 0.65), p < 0.01 (Fig. 2a); IL-6, 0.71 ng/ml
(sd 0.42) vs 6.89 (sd 0.25),
p < 0.01 (Fig. 2b); and IL-8, 0.77 ng/ml (sd 0.39) vs 8.76
ng/ml (sd 0.69), p < 0.01 (Fig. 2c)). However, the concentrations
of IL-1β and TNF-α were unchanged between loaded and unloaded samples
(IL-1β, 4.8 pg/ml (sd 8.2) vs 7.4 pg/ml
(sd 8.4), p = 0.74 (Fig. 2d) and TNF-α, 9.6 pg/ml (sd 8.8) vs 7.6
pg/ml (sd 8.3), p = 0.75 (Fig. 2e)). The administration
of IL-1β or TNF-α also significantly induced PGE2 production compared
with the non-administered control (IL-1β, 0.33 ng/ml (sd 0.055) vs 2.25
ng/ml (sd 0.65), p < 0.01 and TNF-α, 0.33 ng/ml (sd 0.055) vs 1.84
ng/ml (sd 0.63), p < 0.01 (Fig. 2a)). The mRNA levels
of COX-2 and mPGES-1 genes of loaded samples were significantly
higher compared with that of unloaded samples (COX-2, 1 vs 6.97
(sd 3.66), p < 0.01 (Fig. 2f); mPGES-1, 1 vs 5.03
(sd 2.94), p < 0.01 (Fig. 2g)).Graphs showing the
expressions of PGE2 and related molecules by cyclic compressive
loading. a) PGE2 was significantly upregulated by cyclic compressive
loading, interleukin- (IL-)1β, or tumour necrosis factor- (TNF)-α (n =
7). b) IL-6 (n = 6) and c) IL-8 (n = 6) were significantly upregulated
by cyclic compressive loading. d) IL-1β (n = 6) and e) TNF-α (n
= 6) were not upregulated by cyclic compressive loading. f) COX-2
(n = 6) and g) mPGES-1 (n = 5) mRNA levels were significantly upregulated
by cyclic compressive loading (CCL;cyclic compressive loading)*p
< 0.01.
The effects of a COX-2 selective
inhibitor on mechanically induced PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 proteins and
COX-2 gene expressions
The increased concentration of PGE2 by cyclic compressive loading
was impeded in a dose-dependent manner after administration of a
COX-2 selective inhibitor (Fig. 3a). More than 100 nM of a COX-2
selective inhibitor significantly abolished the upregulation of
PGE2 by cyclic compressive loading (p < 0.01). However, the increased
concentration of IL-6 and IL-8 by cyclic compressive loading remained
high, and the inhibitory effects of the COX-2 selective inhibitor
were not observed (Figs 3b and 3c). The upregulation of COX-2 mRNA
levels by cyclic compressive loading was not suppressed by a COX-2
selective inhibitor (Fig. 3d).a) The increased concentration
of PGE2 by cyclic compressive loading was impeded in a dose-dependent
manner (n = 8). b) The increased concentrations of IL-6 (n = 7)
and c) IL-8 (n = 5) by cyclic compressive loading remained high.
d) The upregulation of COX-2 mRNA levels by cyclic compressive loading
was not suppressed by a COX-2 selective inhibitor (n = 5). *p <
0.01
The effects of dexamethasone on
mechanically induced PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 proteins and COX-2 gene expressions
The increased concentration of PGE2 by cyclic compressive loading
was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner after administration of
dexamethasone (Fig. 4a). More than 100 nM of dexamethasone significantly
abolished the upregulation of PGE2 by cyclic compressive loading
(p < 0.01). Similarly, the increased concentration of IL-6 and
IL-8 was also suppressed in a dose-dependent manner (Figs 4b and
4c). More than 100 nM of dexamethasone significantly abolished the
upregulation of IL-6 or IL-8 by cyclic compressive loading (p <
0.01). The upregulation of COX-2 mRNA levels by cyclic compressive
loading was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner after the administration
of dexamethasone (Fig. 4d). More than 10 nM of dexamethasone significantly
abolished the upregulation of COX-2 mRNA levels by cyclic compressive
loading (p < 0.01).Graphs showing the effects
of dexamethasone on mechanically induced PGE2, interleukin- (IL-)6,
and IL-8 proteins and COX-2 gene expressions. The increased concentrations
of a) PGE2 (n = 5), b) IL-6 (n = 5), and c) IL-8 (n = 5) by cyclic
compressive loading were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner.
d) The upregulation of COX-2 mRNA levels by cyclic compressive loading
was also suppressed in a dose-dependent manner (n = 5). *p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
Discussion
Mechanical stress is believed to be important for every cell
in our body, particularly intra-articular tissues such as bone,
cartilage, meniscus, and
synovium, for the maintenance and regeneration of tissues and organs.
Many studies have demonstrated that mechanical stress to chondrocytes,
cartilage explants, or mesenchymal stem cells promoted bone and
cartilage development.[27-30] However, mechanical
stress causes joint diseases, and excessive mechanical stress may
lead to the development of OA. PGE2 is well known as a pathogenic
molecule related to OA development, in addition to MMPs, ADAMTS,
and inflammatory cytokines.[31] To
investigate the molecular mechanisms of PGE2 and related inflammatory
cytokines by mechanical stress, we used the 3D culture system using
cyclic compressive loading, which can mimic the intra-articular
environment through the adjustment of magnitudes, durations, and
frequencies of loads. The loading condition of this study represents
that cyclic loading for one hour at a rate of 0.5 Hz is nearly equal
to the walking pace. We have chosen 40 kPa, which yielded approximately
10% compression strain, because it maximally induced mRNA expression
of MMP1, MMP3, MMP9 and MMP13 genes compared with the lower compressive
loading of 0 kPa or 20 kPa in our previous study.[22] In addition, there
have been no obvious data of biomechanics in synovium as far as
we know, while > 10% compression strain to cartilage was shown to inhibit
proteoglycan and protein synthesis in a dose-dependent manner in
bovinecalfcartilage.[32-34] Therefore, this
loading condition may be considered excessive loading over the physiological
conditions. Also, the loading was applied with uni-axial unconfined
compression, and this condition could also mimic the intra-articular environment,
in which both compressive and tensile stresses are applied to the
synovium.[23,35,36] Moreover, a 3D culture system is better to evaluate
a biological reaction, because 3D culture is close to the physical
environment and there are sometimes differences detected between
2D and 3D cultures.[37-41]In this study, we directly demonstrated that cyclic compressive
loading on a 3D-cultured construct of human synovial fibroblasts
upregulated PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 proteins. We also showed that the
gene expression of COX-2 and mPGES-1, which are the key enzymes
that metabolise arachidonic acid to PGE2, was upregulated by cyclic
compressive loading (Fig. 5). In addition, the upregulation of PGE2
by cyclic compressive loading was suppressed by the administrations
of a COX-2 selective inhibitor or dexamethasone in a dose-dependent
manner. As a pharmacological effect, COX-2 selective inhibitors
inhibit the activity of COX-2, whereas dexamethasone inhibits the synthesis
of COX-2.[42-45] In this study,
a COX-2 selective inhibitor suppressed PGE2 production in a dose-dependent
manner without changing the COX-2 mRNA level, whereas dexamethasone
suppressed PGE2 production by suppressing the COX-2 gene expression.
These results reflect well with the pharmacology of PGE2 inhibition
by NSAIDs and steroids in OA. Interestingly, a COX-2 selective inhibitor
did not suppress IL-6 and IL-8 production, whereas dexamethasone
suppressed these cytokines in a dose-dependent manner. The different
effects of these chemicals on IL-6 and IL-8 may account for the
distinct functions in clinical usage. These functions are still unclear
and further studies are required.Schematic representation of the relationship
between mechanical stress and the expression of PGE2 and related
molecules. Cyclic compressive loading on a 3D cultured construct
of human fibroblasts upregulated PGE2, interleukin- (IL-)6 and IL-8
proteins and COX-2, mPGES-1 mRNA levels without IL-1β and tumour
necrosis factor- (TNF)-α stimulation. These results indicate that
PGE2 upregulation may not be induced via an IL-1β and/or a TNF-α signaling
pathway but via other signaling pathways (S.I.; selective inhibitor,
Dex; dexamethasone).Synovial fibroblasts did not produce IL-1β and TNF-α by cyclic
compressive loading in this study, as reported previously.[6-10] To our surprise, however, synovial fibroblasts produced
PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 without the stimulation of IL-1β and TNF-α,
which are produced by synovial macrophages. Undoubtedly, IL-1β and
TNF-α, produced by synovial macrophages, are considered to be key
factors for OA development through the production of PGE2, MMPs,
and ADAMTSs by synovial fibroblasts and chondrocytes.[2,5,6,15,20,46-50] On the other hand,
it has been unclear what triggers the activation of synovial macrophages.
In this study, PGE2 was significantly upregulated by cyclic compressive
loading without IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation. Also, we have previously
demonstrated that cyclic mechanical stress on synovial fibroblasts
upregulated mRNA levels of MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13, ADAMTS4
and ADAMTS5 genes in a load-dependent manner through the same experiment.[22,23] Taken together, the upregulation
of the key molecules of OA development including PGE2, MMPs, and
ADAMTSs was induced by mechanical stress without the upregulation
of IL-1β and/or TNF-α. In our opinion, therefore, excessive mechanical
stress may ‘switch on’ these gene expressions as the trigger of
OA development without IL-1β and/or TNF-α stimulation. (Fig. 5)
This notion may coincide with some previous studies using animals
and clinical samples, which showed that IL-1β and/or TNF-α were
not necessary in OA development.[51-53] IL-1β-deficient
mice showed development of OA.[51] Moreover,
the recent clinical study showed that IL-1β and TNF-α in the synovial
fluid of patients with OA
were not significantly higher than that in the control group.[52,53] Therefore, it can be explained that mechanical
stress alone is possible to initiate OA development without the
stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines.In a potential limitation of the present study, we did not evaluate
other intra-articular cells, such as chondrocytes and meniscal cells.
These cells also play an important role in the development of OA.
Also, the intracellular signal transductions of PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8
(mechanotransduction) have not been described in detail. In a recent
study, mechanotransductions were reported to be related to the Smad
pathway,[54,55] mitogen-activated
protein kinase pathway,[56-58] or Wnt signaling
pathway.[59-61] Our 3D culture
system may be useful for the explanation of intracellular mechanotransduction.In conclusion, cyclic compressive loading on a 3D cultured construct
of human fibroblasts upregulated PGE2, IL-6 and IL-8 proteins and
COX-2 and mPGES-1 mRNA levels, without IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation.
Further investigation may be useful in revealing the molecular mechanism
of mechanical stress in vivo for a better understanding
of the pathology and therapy of OA.
Authors: R Tsutsumi; H Ito; T Hiramitsu; K Nishitani; M Akiyoshi; T Kitaori; T Yasuda; T Nakamura Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Eman Alaaeldin; Heba A Abou-Taleb; Soad A Mohamad; Mahmoud Elrehany; Shereen S Gaber; Heba F Mansour Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2021-01-08