Literature DB >> 25236755

Identifying species at extinction risk using global models of anthropogenic impact.

Howard Peters1, Bethan C O'Leary, Julie P Hawkins, Callum M Roberts.   

Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Endangered Species employs a robust, standardized approach to assess extinction threat focussed on taxa approaching an end-point in population decline. Used alone, we argue this enforces a reactive approach to conservation. Species not assessed as threatened but which occur predominantly in areas with high levels of anthropogenic impact may require proactive conservation management to prevent loss. We matched distribution and bathymetric range data from the global Red List assessment of 632 species of marine cone snails with human impacts and projected ocean thermal stress and aragonite saturation (a proxy for ocean acidification). Our results show 67 species categorized as 'Least Concern' have 70% or more of their occupancy in places subject to high and very high levels of human impact with 18 highly restricted species (range <100 km(2)) living exclusively in such places. Using a range-rarity scoring method we identified where clusters of endemic species are subject to all three stressors: high human impact, declining aragonite saturation levels and elevated thermal stress. Our approach reinforces Red List threatened status, highlights candidate species for reassessment, contributes important evidential data to minimize data deficiency and identifies regions and species for proactive conservation.
© 2014 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conus; Red List; aragonite; climate change; marine pollution; ocean acidification; sea surface temperature; thermal stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236755     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  5 in total

Review 1.  Marine protected areas in the context of climate change: key challenges for coastal social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Daniela N Schmidt; M Pieraccini; L Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Environmental gap analysis to prioritize conservation efforts in eastern Africa.

Authors:  Paulo van Breugel; Roeland Kindt; Jens-Peter Barnekow Lillesø; Michiel van Breugel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Regional and local environmental conditions do not shape the response to warming of a marine habitat-forming species.

Authors:  C Crisci; J-B Ledoux; K Mokhtar-Jamaï; M Bally; N Bensoussan; D Aurelle; E Cebrian; R Coma; J-P Féral; M La Rivière; C Linares; P López-Sendino; C Marschal; M Ribes; N Teixidó; F Zuberer; J Garrabou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Implications of the prevalence and magnitude of sustained declines for determining a minimum threshold for favourable population size.

Authors:  Rhys E Green; Gillian Gilbert; Jeremy D Wilson; Kate Jennings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genetic management on the brink of extinction: sequencing microsatellites does not improve estimates of inbreeding in wild and captive Vancouver Island marmots (Marmota vancouverensis).

Authors:  Kimberley G Barrett; Geneviève Amaral; Melanie Elphinstone; Malcolm L McAdie; Corey S Davis; Jasmine K Janes; John Carnio; Axel Moehrenschlager; Jamieson C Gorrell
Journal:  Conserv Genet       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.538

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.