Literature DB >> 25236397

Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with different pouch size in Chinese T2DM patients with BMI 30-35 kg/m2.

Yixing Ren1, Wah Yang, Jingge Yang, Cunchuan Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with different pouch size in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with measured body mass index (BMI) 30-35 kg/m(2).
METHODS: In this randomized and prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of RYGB with smaller size pouch (10-20 ml) versus larger pouch size (25-35 ml) in 76 Chinese obese patients (33 F, 43 M) with T2DM. According to protocol, all patients were divided into two groups, smaller pouch size group and larger pouch size group, and underwent RYGB surgery. Primary inclusion criteria of study were (a) a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin level >7.0 %), (b) measured BMI of at least 30 kg/m(2) and not yet 35 kg/m(2), and (c) age between 25 and 60 years old, and (d) patients were excluded if they had previously undergone complex abdominal surgery or bariatric surgery. Weight loss, BMI, percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL), glycated hemoglobin, and fasting plasma glucose were obtained at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Of these 76 patients, 69 (91 %) patients completed follow-up postoperative 12 months. Weight loss and % EWL at 12 months was greater in smaller pouch size group (mean 15.8 kg, 95 % CI -17.2 to -14.4 and mean 68.9, 95 % CI 62.5-75.2 %) than in larger pouch size group (mean -13.7 kg, 95 % CI -15.3 to -12.1, and mean 59.1, 95 % CI 52.8-65.5) (P = 0.046, P = 0.033, respectively). Glycemic control improved in both two groups, with a mean glycated hemoglobin level of 6.2 % (95 % CI 6.0-6.5 %) in smaller size group, and 6.7 % (95 % CI 6.4-7.0 %) in larger size group (P = 0.025, P < 0.05). The fasting plasma glucose level decreased significantly after surgery, with a mean level of 5.4 mmol/L (95 % CI 5.2-5.5 mmol/L) and 5.6 mmol/L (95 % CI 5.5-5.8 mmol/L) respectively, (P = 0.040, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study, in Chinese T2DM patients with BMI 30-35 kg/m(2), we observed a greater efficiency on weight loss and glycemic control with smaller pouch size compared to larger pouch size. In the future, long-term follow-up and large sample study will be necessary to confirm these outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25236397     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1411-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  19 in total

1.  Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  IFSO-APC consensus statements 2011.

Authors:  Kazunori Kasama; Wilfred Mui; Wei Jei Lee; Muffazal Lakdawala; Takeshi Naitoh; Yosuke Seki; Akira Sasaki; Go Wakabayashi; Iwao Sasaki; Isao Kawamura; Lilian Kow; Harry Frydenberg; Anton Chen; Mahendra Narwaria; Pradeep Chowbey
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study.

Authors:  E Disse; A Pasquer; P Espalieu; G Poncet; C Gouillat; M Robert
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Measurement of Functional Pouch Volume following the Gastric Bypass Procedure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  K Roberts; A Duffy; J Kaufman; M Burrell; J Dziura; R Bell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  David E Cummings; David S Weigle; R Scott Frayo; Patricia A Breen; Marina K Ma; E Patchen Dellinger; Jonathan Q Purnell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The importance of caloric restriction in the early improvements in insulin sensitivity after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  James M Isbell; Robyn A Tamboli; Erik N Hansen; Jabbar Saliba; Julia P Dunn; Sharon E Phillips; Pamela A Marks-Shulman; Naji N Abumrad
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Lack of correlation between variation in small-volume gastric pouch size and weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Elizabeth A O'Connor; Arthur M Carlin
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Philip R Schauer; Bartolome Burguera; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Dan Cottam; William Gourash; Giselle Hamad; George M Eid; Samer Mattar; Ramesh Ramanathan; Emma Barinas-Mitchel; R Harsha Rao; Lewis Kuller; David Kelley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparative effectiveness of bariatric surgery vs. nonsurgical treatment of type 2 diabetes among severely obese adults.

Authors:  David Arterburn; Andy Bogart; Karen J Coleman; Sebastien Haneuse; Joe V Selby; Nancy E Sherwood; Stephen Sidney; Mary Kay Theis; Guilherme M Campos; David McCulloch; Patrick J O' Connor
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.288

View more
  8 in total

1.  A systematic review of the effect of gastric pouch and/or gastrojejunostomy (stoma) size on weight loss outcomes with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kamal Mahawar; Alistair J Sharples; Yitka Graham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  It's the Width Not the Size of the Pouch That Matters.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Gap Between Evidence and Patient Access: Policy Implications for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Chia-Wen Hsiao; Martha C Romney; Ricardo Cohen; Francesco Rubino; Philip Schauer; Pierre Cremieux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Comparison of the efficacy of standard bariatric surgical procedures on Saudi population using the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system.

Authors:  Azzam Al Kadi; Zakaur R Siddiqui; Arshad M Malik; Mohammed Al Naami
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  The Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Type 2 Diabetes in Asian Populations: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jin Hwa Kim; Jung-Soo Pyo; Won Jin Cho; Sang Yong Kim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Ongoing Inconsistencies in Weight Loss Reporting Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentin Mocanu; Awrad Nasralla; Jerry Dang; Mack Jacobson; Noah Switzer; Karen Madsen; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Large Versus Small Gastric Pouch for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and a Body Mass Index < 35 kg/m2: Six-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Song Dai; Guohui Wang; Weizheng Li; Zhi Song; Zhihong Su; Shaihong Zhu; Liyong Zhu; Pengzhou Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Is Bariatric Surgery Effective for Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Body Mass Index < 35 kg/m2? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yichen Li; Yijie Gu; Yujia Jin; Zhongqi Mao
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.129

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.