Literature DB >> 25234905

Dose-response relationships for the onset of avoidance of sonar by free-ranging killer whales.

Patrick J O Miller1, Ricardo N Antunes1, Paul J Wensveen1, Filipa I P Samarra1, Ana Catarina Alves1, Peter L Tyack1, Petter H Kvadsheim2, Lars Kleivane2, Frans-Peter A Lam3, Michael A Ainslie3, Len Thomas4.   

Abstract

Eight experimentally controlled exposures to 1-2 kHz or 6-7 kHz sonar signals were conducted with four killer whale groups. The source level and proximity of the source were increased during each exposure in order to reveal response thresholds. Detailed inspection of movements during each exposure session revealed sustained changes in speed and travel direction judged to be avoidance responses during six of eight sessions. Following methods developed for Phase-I clinical trials in human medicine, response thresholds ranging from 94 to 164 dB re 1 μPa received sound pressure level (SPL) were fitted to Bayesian dose-response functions. Thresholds did not consistently differ by sonar frequency or whether a group had previously been exposed, with a mean SPL response threshold of 142 ± 15 dB (mean ± s.d.). High levels of between- and within-individual variability were identified, indicating that thresholds depended upon other undefined contextual variables. The dose-response functions indicate that some killer whales started to avoid sonar at received SPL below thresholds assumed by the U.S. Navy. The predicted extent of habitat over which avoidance reactions occur depends upon whether whales responded to proximity or received SPL of the sonar or both, but was large enough to raise concerns about biological consequences to the whales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234905     DOI: 10.1121/1.4861346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Selective reactions to different killer whale call categories in two delphinid species.

Authors:  Matthew T Bowers; Ari S Friedlaender; Vincent M Janik; Douglas P Nowacek; Nicola J Quick; Brandon L Southall; Andrew J Read
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  A path reconstruction method integrating dead-reckoning and position fixes applied to humpback whales.

Authors:  Paul J Wensveen; Len Thomas; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  Harbour porpoises react to low levels of high frequency vessel noise.

Authors:  Monika Dyndo; Danuta Maria Wiśniewska; Laia Rojano-Doñate; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Formal comment to Gong et al.: Ecosystem scale acoustic sensing reveals humpback whale behavior synchronous with herring spawning processes and re-evaluation finds no effect of sonar on humpback song occurrence in the Gulf of Maine in fall 2006.

Authors:  Denise Risch; Peter J Corkeron; William T Ellison; Sofie M Van Parijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Acoustic and foraging behavior of a Baird's beaked whale, Berardius bairdii, exposed to simulated sonar.

Authors:  A K Stimpert; S L DeRuiter; B L Southall; D J Moretti; E A Falcone; J A Goldbogen; A Friedlaender; G S Schorr; J Calambokidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Disturbance-specific social responses in long-finned pilot whales, Globicephala melas.

Authors:  Fleur Visser; Charlotte Curé; Petter H Kvadsheim; Frans-Peter A Lam; Peter L Tyack; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  When the noise goes on: received sound energy predicts sperm whale responses to both intermittent and continuous navy sonar.

Authors:  Saana Isojunno; Paul J Wensveen; Frans-Peter A Lam; Petter H Kvadsheim; Alexander M von Benda-Beckmann; Lucía M Martín López; Lars Kleivane; Eilidh M Siegal; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Context-dependent variability in the predicted daily energetic costs of disturbance for blue whales.

Authors:  Enrico Pirotta; Cormac G Booth; David E Cade; John Calambokidis; Daniel P Costa; James A Fahlbusch; Ari S Friedlaender; Jeremy A Goldbogen; John Harwood; Elliott L Hazen; Leslie New; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  200 kHz commercial sonar systems generate lower frequency side lobes audible to some marine mammals.

Authors:  Z Daniel Deng; Brandon L Southall; Thomas J Carlson; Jinshan Xu; Jayson J Martinez; Mark A Weiland; John M Ingraham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  First indications that northern bottlenose whales are sensitive to behavioural disturbance from anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  P J O Miller; P H Kvadsheim; F P A Lam; P L Tyack; C Curé; S L DeRuiter; L Kleivane; L D Sivle; S P van IJsselmuide; F Visser; P J Wensveen; A M von Benda-Beckmann; L M Martín López; T Narazaki; S K Hooker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.