Literature DB >> 25234846

Psychiatric implications of cancer genetic testing.

April Malia Hirschberg1, Gayun Chan-Smutko, William F Pirl.   

Abstract

As genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes has transitioned from research to clinical settings, research regarding its accompanying psychosocial effects has grown. Men and women being tested for hereditary cancer syndromes may experience some psychological distress while going through the process of testing or after carrier status is identified. Psychological distress appears to decrease over the course of the first year and it is typically not clinically significant. Longer term studies show mixed results with some mutation carriers continuing to experience elevated distress. Baseline distress is the greatest risk factor for both immediate (weeks-12 months) and long-term psychological distress (18 mo-8 years post genetic testing). In addition to baseline psychological distress, other risk factors can be identified to help identify individuals who may need psychosocial interventions during the genetic testing process. The challenges of providing clinical care to the growing population of individuals identified to be at increased risk for heritable cancers present opportunities for research and new models of care.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; HNPCC; Lynch syndrome; carrier; genetic testing; hereditary cancer syndrome; psychosocial; risk-reducing surgeries; unaffected carrier

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234846     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

1.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Mental Illness and BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Intention Among Multiethnic Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Tarsha Jones; Katherine Freeman; Marra Ackerman; Meghna S Trivedi; Thomas Silverman; Peter Shapiro; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Relationship between individual and family characteristics and psychosocial factors in persons with familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Meghan Underhill; Fangxin Hong; Janette Lawrence; Traci Blonquist; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.

Authors:  J Wynn; R Ottman; J Duong; A L Wilson; P Ahimaz; J Martinez; R Rabin; E Rosen; R Webster; C Au; M T Cho; C Egan; E Guzman; M Primiano; J E Shaw; R Sisson; R L Klitzman; P S Appelbaum; U Lichter-Konecki; K Anyane-Yeboa; A Iglesias; W K Chung
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.

Authors:  Heidi S Lumish; Hallie Steinfeld; Carrie Koval; Donna Russo; Elana Levinson; Julia Wynn; James Duong; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  How does genetic testing influence anxiety, depression, and quality of life? A hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome suspects trial.

Authors:  Francisca Fernanda Barbosa Oliveira; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Rosane Oliveira de Sant'Ana; Clarissa Gondim Picanço de Albuquerque; Maria Júlia Barbosa Bezerra; Deysi Viviana Tenazoa Wong; Flávio da Silveira Bitencourt; Isabelle Joyce de Lima Silva-Fernandes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Genetics in palliative oncology: a missing agenda? A review of the literature and future directions.

Authors:  April Morrow; Chris Jacobs; Megan Best; Sian Greening; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maia J Frieser; Sylia Wilson; Scott Vrieze
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.