| Literature DB >> 25234806 |
Akkelies E Dijkstra1, H Marike Boezen2, Maarten van den Berge2, Judith M Vonk2, Pieter S Hiemstra2, R Graham Barr2, Kirsten M Burkart2, Ani Manichaikul2, Tess D Pottinger2, Edward K Silverman2, Michael H Cho2, James D Crapo2, Terri H Beaty2, Per Bakke2, Amund Gulsvik2, David A Lomas2, Yohan Bossé2, David C Nickle2, Peter D Paré2, Harry J de Koning2, Jan-Willem Lammers2, Pieter Zanen2, Joanna Smolonska2, Ciska Wijmenga2, Corry-Anke Brandsma2, Harry J M Groen2, Dirkje S Postma2.
Abstract
Smoking is a notorious risk factor for chronic mucus hypersecretion (CMH). CMH frequently occurs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The question arises whether the same single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are related to CMH in smokers with and without COPD. We performed two genome-wide association studies of CMH under an additive genetic model in male heavy smokers (≥20 pack-years) with COPD (n=849, 39.9% CMH) and without COPD (n=1348, 25.4% CMH), followed by replication and meta-analysis in comparable populations, and assessment of the functional relevance of significantly associated SNPs. Genome-wide association analysis of CMH in COPD and non-COPD subjects yielded no genome-wide significance after replication. In COPD, our top SNP (rs10461985, p=5.43×10(-5)) was located in the GDNF-AS1 gene that is functionally associated with the GDNF gene. Expression of GDNF in bronchial biopsies of COPD patients was significantly associated with CMH (p=0.007). In non-COPD subjects, four SNPs had a p-value <10(-5) in the meta-analysis, including a SNP (rs4863687) in the MAML3 gene, the T-allele showing modest association with CMH (p=7.57×10(-6), OR 1.48) and with significantly increased MAML3 expression in lung tissue (p=2.59×10(-12)). Our data suggest the potential for differential genetic backgrounds of CMH in individuals with and without COPD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25234806 PMCID: PMC4498483 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00093314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 16.671