Literature DB >> 25234531

Computer-aided trauma simulation system with haptic feedback is easy and fast for oral-maxillofacial surgeons to learn and use.

Sara C Schvartzman1, Rebeka Silva2, Ken Salisbury3, Dyani Gaudilliere4, Sabine Girod5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computer-assisted surgical (CAS) planning tools have become widely available in craniomaxillofacial surgery, but are time consuming and often require professional technical assistance to simulate a case. An initial oral and maxillofacial (OM) surgical user experience was evaluated with a newly developed CAS system featuring a bimanual sense of touch (haptic).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three volunteer OM surgeons received a 5-minute verbal introduction to the use of a newly developed haptic-enabled planning system. The surgeons were instructed to simulate mandibular fracture reductions of 3 clinical cases, within a 15-minute time limit and without a time limit, and complete a questionnaire to assess their subjective experience with the system. Standard landmarks and linear and angular measurements between the simulated results and the actual surgical outcome were compared.
RESULTS: After the 5-minute instruction, all 3 surgeons were able to use the system independently. The analysis of standardized anatomic measurements showed that the simulation results within a 15-minute time limit were not significantly different from those without a time limit. Mean differences between measurements of surgical and simulated fracture reductions were within current resolution limitations in collision detection, segmentation of computed tomographic scans, and haptic devices. All 3 surgeons reported that the system was easy to learn and use and that they would be comfortable integrating it into their daily clinical practice for trauma cases.
CONCLUSION: A CAS system with a haptic interface that capitalizes on touch and force feedback experience similar to operative procedures is fast and easy for OM surgeons to learn and use.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234531     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Experience in Otolaryngology Residency: A National Survey of Program Directors.

Authors:  Melissa S Oh; Anita B Sethna; Oswaldo A Henriquez
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-06-22

2.  Computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models.

Authors:  Jürgen Wallner; Irene Mischak
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Haptics-assisted Virtual Planning of Bone, Soft Tissue, and Vessels in Fibula Osteocutaneous Free Flaps.

Authors:  Pontus Olsson; Fredrik Nysjö; Andrés Rodríguez-Lorenzo; Andreas Thor; Jan-Michaél Hirsch; Ingrid B Carlbom
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

4.  Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic open-source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone: Practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action.

Authors:  Jürgen Wallner; Kerstin Hochegger; Xiaojun Chen; Irene Mischak; Knut Reinbacher; Mauro Pau; Tomislav Zrnc; Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer; Wolfgang Zemann; Dieter Schmalstieg; Jan Egger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.