Literature DB >> 25234045

Comparison of human and electronic observation for the measurement of compliance with hand hygiene.

Miguel Almeida O Filho1, Alexandre R Marra2, Thyago Pereira Magnus1, Rodrigo Dias Rodrigues1, Marcelo Prado3, Tales Roberto de Souza Santini3, Elivane da Silva Victor1, Eder Issao Ishibe3, Oscar Fernando Pavão Dos Santos4, Michael B Edmond5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of hand hygiene is an important part of the improvement of hospital quality indicators.
METHODS: This study was prospectively performed over a 14-week (electronic observer) period from December 3, 2013-March 9, 2014, to evaluate hand hygiene compliance in an adult step-down unit. We compared electronic handwash counters with the application of radiofrequency identification (RFID - ZigBee; i-Healthsys, São Carlos, Brazil) (electronic observer), which counts each activation of the alcohol gel dispenser to direct observation (human observer) using the iScrub application.
RESULTS: For the overall time period of simultaneous electronic and human observation, we found that the electronic observer identified 414 hand hygiene episodes, whereas the human observers identified 448 episodes. Therefore, we found 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-95%) overall concordance (414/448), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92).
CONCLUSION: Our RFID (ZigBee) system showed good accuracy (92%) and is a useful method to monitor hand hygiene compliance.
Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand hygiene monitor; Handwash; Hawthorne effect; Radiofrequency identification; Zigbee

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234045     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  6 in total

1.  Real-time feedback for improving compliance to hand sanitization among healthcare workers in an open layout ICU using radiofrequency identification.

Authors:  Kedar Radhakrishna; Abijeet Waghmare; Maria Ekstrand; Tony Raj; Sumithra Selvam; Sai Madhukar Sreerama; Sriram Sampath
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Impact of replacing powdered gloves with powder-free gloves on hand-hygiene compliance among healthcare workers of an intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti; Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues; Marcia A Ciol; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Anibal Basile-Filho; Silvia Rita Marin da Silva Canini; Elucir Gir; Ana Maria Laus
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 3.  Electronic Monitoring Systems for Hand Hygiene: Systematic Review of Technology.

Authors:  Chaofan Wang; Weiwei Jiang; Kangning Yang; Difeng Yu; Joshua Newn; Zhanna Sarsenbayeva; Jorge Goncalves; Vassilis Kostakos
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Belgian hand hygiene campaigns in ICU, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Sylvanus Fonguh; Annie Uwineza; Boudewijn Catry; Anne Simon
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2016-11-07

Review 5.  Role of Human Factors Engineering in Infection Prevention: Gaps and Opportunities.

Authors:  Priyadarshini R Pennathur; Loreen A Herwaldt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-06

6.  Hand hygiene performance in an intensive care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Eduardo Casaroto; Jose Roberto Generoso; Bruna Marques Tofaneto; Luigi Makowski Bariani; Mariana de Amorim Auler; Nathalia Xavier; Marcelo Prado; Elivane da Silva Victor; Takaaki Kobayashi; Michael B Edmond; Fernando Gatti de Menezes; Alexandre R Marra
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.303

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.