Literature DB >> 25234025

Prognostic significance of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and its relationship to survival beyond time to PSA nadir for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases after primary androgen deprivation therapy.

Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh1, James Hok Leung Tsu, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Samson Yun Sang Chan, Peter Ka Fung Chiu, Wai-Man Lee, Ka-Wing Wong, Kwan-Lun Ho, Simon See Ming Hou, Chi-Fai Ng, Ming-Kwong Yiu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prognostic significance of time to the prostate-specific antigen nadir (TTPN) and its relationship to survival beyond TTPN in metastatic prostate cancer after primary androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT).
METHODS: All metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with primary ADT from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. The prognostic significance of TTPN in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) beyond TTPN and overall survival (OS) beyond TTPN was analyzed using the Cox regression model. The median PFS and OS were plotted against TTPN on a monthly interval. The PFS beyond TTPN and the OS beyond TTPN with reference to TTPN were calculated and presented.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 419 patients with a median follow-up period of 38 months. The findings showed that TTPN was a significant prognostic indicator for both PFS beyond TTPN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and OS beyond TTPN (HR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.47-0.90, p = 0.01) according to Cox regression analyses. The relationship between TTPN and survival beyond TTPN consisted of three phases. In the first phase (<3 months for PFS and <6 months for OS), the survival beyond TTPN increased with TTPN. In the second phase (3-17 months for PFS and 6-20 months for OS), the survival beyond TTPN remained relatively static. In the third phase (>17 months for PFS and >20 months for OS), the survival beyond TTPN increased exponentially with TTPN.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, TTPN was a good prognostic indicator for PFS beyond TTPN and OS beyond TTPN in metastatic prostate cancer cases after primary ADT. Different TTPNs had different implications for predicting survival beyond TTPN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234025     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of poor response to first-generation anti-androgens as criteria for alternate treatments for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenichiro Fukuoka; Jun Teishima; Hirotaka Nagamatsu; Shogo Inoue; Tetsutaro Hayashi; Koji Mita; Masanobu Shigeta; Kanao Kobayashi; Mitsuru Kajiwara; Yuichi Kadonishi; Takatoshi Tacho; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Disease Progression/Clinical Outcome Model for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated With Eribulin.

Authors:  J G C van Hasselt; A Gupta; Z Hussein; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens; A D R Huitema
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Predictive factor of androgen deprivation therapy for patients with advanced stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chaiyut Kongseang; Worapat Attawettayanon; Watid Kanchanawanichkul; Choosak Pripatnanont
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Significance of the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhu Wang; Yuliang Wang; Jianwen Zhang; Qiyi Hu; Fan Zhi; Shengping Zhang; Dengqi Mao; Ying Zhang; Hui Liang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Treatment strategy for metastatic prostate cancer with extremely high PSA level: reconsidering the value of vintage therapy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Shinichi Sakamoto; Yoshiyasu Amiya; Makoto Sasaki; Takayuki Shima; Akira Komiya; Noriyuki Suzuki; Koichiro Akakura; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Hiroomi Nakatsu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Development and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guangdong Hou; Yu Zheng; Di Wei; Xi'an Li; Fuli Wang; Jingyang Tian; Geng Zhang; Fei Yan; Zheng Zhu; Ping Meng; Jiarui Yuan; Ming Gao; Zhibin Li; Bin Zhang; Zibao Xing; Jianlin Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  EPHB4 inhibition activates ER stress to promote immunogenic cell death of prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Vinay Sagar; Rajita Vatapalli; Barbara Lysy; Sahithi Pamarthy; Jonathan F Anker; Yara Rodriguez; Huiying Han; Kenji Unno; Walter M Stadler; William J Catalona; Maha Hussain; Parkash S Gill; Sarki A Abdulkadir
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Association of time to prostate-specific antigen nadir and logarithm of prostate-specific antigen velocity after progression in metastatic prostate cancer with prior primary androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Jeremy Yc Teoh; James Hl Tsu; Steffi Kk Yuen; Peter Kf Chiu; Samson Ys Chan; Ka-Wing Wong; Kwan-Lun Ho; Simon Sm Hou; Chi-Fai Ng; Ming-Kwong Yiu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetic as a prognostic factor in metastatic prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andika Afriansyah; Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid; Chaidir Arif Mochtar; Rainy Umbas
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Incidence of patients with bone metastases at diagnosis of solid tumors in adults: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Jin-Feng Huang; Jianfei Shen; Xiao Li; Ramesh Rengan; Nicola Silvestris; Minqi Wang; Lisa Derosa; Xuanqi Zheng; Andrea Belli; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Yan Michael Li; Aimin Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.