Literature DB >> 25233162

Effect of surgical treatment on mortality after acetabular fracture in the elderly: a multicenter study of 454 patients.

Joshua L Gary1, Ebrahim Paryavi, Steven D Gibbons, Michael J Weaver, Jordan H Morgan, Scott P Ryan, Adam J Starr, Robert V OʼToole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding the effect of operative treatment on mortality after acetabular fracture in elderly patients. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would confer a mortality benefit compared with nonoperative treatment even after adjusting for comorbidities associated with death.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Three University Level I Trauma Centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 60 years and older with acetabular fractures treated from 2002 to 2009 were included in the study. Four hundred fifty-four patients were identified with an average age of 74 years. Sixty-seven percent of the study group was male and 33% female. INTERVENTION: One of 4 treatments: nonoperative management with early mobilization, percutaneous reduction and fixation, open reduction and internal fixation, acute total hip arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for covariates of interest.
RESULTS: In contrast to previous smaller studies, the overall mortality was relatively low at 16% at 1 year [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-19]. Unadjusted survivorship curves suggested higher 1-year mortality rates for nonoperatively treated patients (21% vs. 13%, P < 0.001); however, nonoperative treatment was associated with other risk factors for higher mortality. By accounting for these patient risk factors, our final multivariate model of survival demonstrated no significant difference in hazard of death for nonoperative treatment (0.92, P = 0.6) nor for any of the 3 operative treatment subgroups (P range, 0.4-0.8). As expected, we did find a significantly increased hazard for factors such as the Charlson comorbidity index [HR, 1.25 per point (95% CI, 1.16-1.34)] and age [HR, 1.08 per year of age more than 70 years (95% CI, 1.05-1.11)]. In addition, associated fracture patterns (compared with elementary patterns) significantly increased the hazard of death with a ratio of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.10-2.06).
CONCLUSIONS: The operative treatment of acetabular fractures does not increase or decrease mortality, once comorbidities are taken into account. The reasons for this are unknown. Regardless of the causes, the decision for operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures should not be justified based on the concern for increased or decreased mortality alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25233162     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  17 in total

1.  Return to work after surgically treated acetabular fractures in an Asian population.

Authors:  Hannah Jia Hui Ng; Dew Jia Min Lim; Ren Yong; Derek Howard Park; Antony Xavier Rex Premchand
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 2.  Management of acetabular fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Nikhil Shah; Inder P Gill; Vijaya Kumar Hosahalli Kempanna; Mohammad R Iqbal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-19

3.  Comparison of outcomes of operative versus non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly and severely comorbid patient.

Authors:  Kempland C Walley; P T Appleton; E K Rodriguez
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 4.  What's New in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

Authors:  Ian Hasegawa; Morgan Hasegawa; John P Livingstone; Thomas J K Kane; Lorrin Lee
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2022-03

Review 5.  Acetabular fractures treatment needs in the elderly and nonagenarians.

Authors:  Julia Riemenschneider; Jan Tilmann Vollrath; Nils Mühlenfeld; Johannes Frank; Ingo Marzi; Maren Janko
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 6.  Articular disimpaction in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Srinivas Kasha; Ranjith Kumar Yalamanchili
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-18

7.  Factors associated with mortality in older patients sustaining pelvic or acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Anna Harrison; Alejandro Ordas-Bayon; Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon; Mary Fortune; Daud Chou; Peter Hull; Andrew Carrothers; Jaikirty Rawal
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly: Midterm Outcomes of Column Stabilisation and Primary Arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Ortega-Briones; S Smith; M Rickman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review of the results.

Authors:  Antomio Capone; Marcella Peri; Michele Mastio
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

10.  Treatment modalities and outcomes following acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian P McCormick; Joseph Serino; Sebastian Orman; Alex R Webb; David X Wang; Amin Mohamadi; Sharri Mortensen; Michael J Weaver; Arvind Von Keudell
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.