Literature DB >> 25232545

Clinical usefulness and current problems of pancreatic duct stenting for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Yuji Sakai1, Toshio Tsuyuguchi1, Osamu Yokosuka1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic procedure with high frequency of accidental symptoms, and particularly some patients who develop and aggravate pancreatitis due to the procedure may need treatment of surgery or die. Various attempts were performed so far to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis, however, it is impossible to completely prevent pancreatitis at this time because there are various factors for occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. One of the most frequent causes of post-ERCP pancreatitis is considered to be congestion of pancreatic juice associated with duodenal papilledema after examination or treatment. Recently it is often reported that use of a pancreatic duct stent may prevent occurrence of pancreatitis which occurs because of an increased inner pressure of the pancreatic duct caused by congestion of pancreatic juice associated with duodenal papilledema. However, there are some patients who develop pancreatitis even if treated with the pancreatic duct stent, thus further clarification of the pathology and advancement of the prophylactic method will be needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatic duct stent; Pancreatic stenting; Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232545      PMCID: PMC4163764          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  29 in total

1.  Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones.

Authors:  T Aizawa; N Ueno
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic pancreatic duct stents reduce the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Atsushi Sofuni; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Hiroshi Kawakami; Atsushi Irisawa; Kensuke Kubota; Shinji Okaniwa; Masataka Kikuyama; Hiromu Kutsumi; Keiji Hanada; Toshiharu Ueki; Takao Itoi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Chi-Liang Cheng; Stuart Sherman; James L Watkins; Jeffrey Barnett; Martin Freeman; Joseph Geenen; Michael Ryan; Harrison Parker; James T Frakes; Evan L Fogel; William B Silverman; Kulwinder S Dua; Giuseppe Aliperti; Paul Yakshe; Michael Uzer; Whitney Jones; John Goff; Laura Lazzell-Pannell; Abdullah Rashdan; M'hamed Temkit; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone.

Authors:  E L Fogel; D Eversman; P Jamidar; S Sherman; G A Lehman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent.

Authors:  Atsushi Sofuni; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Takao Itoi; Akio Katanuma; Hiroyuki Hisai; Teitetsu Niido; Masayuki Toyota; Tsuneshi Fujii; Youji Harada; Tadanori Takada
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Authors:  Kei Ito; Naotaka Fujita; Yutaka Noda; Go Kobayashi; Takashi Obana; Jun Horaguchi; Osamu Takasawa; Shinsuke Koshita; Yoshihide Kanno
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Safety and outcome of endoscopic snare excision of the major duodenal papilla.

Authors:  Ian D Norton; Christopher J Gostout; Todd H Baron; Alex Geller; Bret T Petersen; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman; Carol Overby; Dongfeng Qi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Can endoscopic sphincterotomy be performed safely in elderly patients aged 80 years or older with pancreatic and biliary diseases?

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Nobuto Hirata; So Nakaji; Kenji Shimura; Tatsuya Fujimoto; Shin Tsuchiya; Takayoshi Nishino; Takao Nishikawa; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2013-09

10.  Temporary pancreatic stent to prevent post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a preliminary, single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takayoshi Tsuchiya; Takao Itoi; Atsushi Sofuni; Fumihide Itokawa; Toshio Kurihara; Kentaro Ishii; Syujiro Tsuji; Takashi Kawai; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-05-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk of pancreatitis after pancreatic duct guidewire placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Yuki Ishikawa-Kakiya; Masatsugu Shiba; Hirotsugu Maruyama; Kunihiro Kato; Shusei Fukunaga; Satoshi Sugimori; Koji Otani; Shuhei Hosomi; Fumio Tanaka; Yasuaki Nagami; Koichi Taira; Hirokazu Yamagami; Tetsuya Tanigawa; Toshio Watanabe; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Increased Use of Prophylactic Measures in Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Christina J Sperna Weiland; Megan M L Engels; Alexander C Poen; Abha Bhalla; Niels G Venneman; Jeanin E van Hooft; Marco J Bruno; Robert C Verdonk; Paul Fockens; Joost P H Drenth; Erwin J M van Geenen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.