| Literature DB >> 25232292 |
Wen-Jun Yao1, Bing-Yang Cao2, He-Ming Yun3, Bao-Ming Chen3.
Abstract
Thermal transport properties of graphene with nanosized constrictions are investigated using nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the nanosized constrictions have a significant influence on the thermal transport properties of graphene. The thermal resistance of the nanosized constrictions is on the order of 10(7) to 10(9) K/W at 150 K, which reduces the thermal conductivity by 7.7% to 90.4%. It is also found that the constriction resistance is inversely proportional to the width of the constriction and independent of the heat current. Moreover, we developed an analytical model for the ballistic thermal resistance of the nanosized constrictions in two-dimensional nanosystems. The theoretical prediction agrees well with the simulation results in this paper, which suggests that the thermal transport across the nanosized constrictions in two-dimensional nanosystems is ballistic in nature. PACS: 65.80.CK; 61.48.Gh; 63.20.kp; 31.15.xv.Entities:
Keywords: Ballistic resistance; Graphene; Molecular dynamics simulation; Nanosized constriction
Year: 2014 PMID: 25232292 PMCID: PMC4155042 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1Schematic of molecular dynamics simulation. (a) Simulation system including a high-temperature slab (red) and a low-temperature slab (blue) with fixed boundaries (green). (b) Detailed structure of the constriction.
Figure 2Typical temperature profile. The temperature profile is obtained by injecting the heat current of 0.5243 μW. The inset shows the corresponding simulation system with the constriction width of 1.512 nm.
Figure 3Temperature profiles versus heat current. (a, b) From different systems with the constriction widths of 1.08 and 1.512 nm, respectively. The insets show the temperature jump extracted from the temperature profiles versus the heat current.
Figure 4Constriction resistance versus width of constriction. The dots are MD results and the curve is the theoretical prediction given by Equation 9.
Figure 5Thermal conductance ratio versus width of constriction. The inset is the corresponding pristine graphene.