Literature DB >> 25232187

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with 7-gauge, 8-gauge, 9-gauge, 10-gauge, and 11-gauge needles: how many specimens are necessary?

Heike Preibsch1, Astrid Baur2, Beate M Wietek2, Bernhard Krämer3, Annette Staebler4, Claus D Claussen2, Katja C Siegmann-Luz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Published national and international guidelines and consensus meetings on the use of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) give different recommendations regarding the required numbers of tissue specimens depending on needle size and imaging method.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the weights of specimens obtained with different VAB needles to facilitate the translation of the required number of specimens between different breast biopsy systems and needle sizes, respectively.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five different VAB systems and seven different needle sizes were used: Mammotome® (11-gauge (G), 8-G), Vacora® (10-G), ATEC Sapphire™ (9-G), 8-G Mammotome® Revolve™, and EnCor Enspire® (10-G, 7-G). We took 24 (11-G) or 20 (7-10-G) tissue cores from a turkey breast phantom. The mean weight of a single tissue core was calculated for each needle size. A matrix, which allows the translation of the required number of tissue cores for different needle sizes, was generated. Results were compared to the true cumulative tissue weights of consecutively harvested tissue cores.
RESULTS: The mean tissue weights obtained with the 11-G / 10-G Vacora® / 10-G Enspire® / 9-G / 8-G Original / 8-G Revolve™ / 7-G needles were 0.084 g / 0.142 g / 0.221 g / 0.121 g / 0.192 g / 0.334 g / 0.363 g, respectively. The calculated required numbers of VAB tissue cores for each needle size build the matrix. For example, the minimum calculated number of required cores according to the current German S3 guideline is 20 / 12 / 8 / 14 / 9 / 5 / 5 for needles of 11-G / 10-G Vacora® / 10-G Enspire® / 9-G / 8-G Original / 8-G Revolve™ / 7-G size. These numbers agree with the true cumulative tissue weights.
CONCLUSION: The presented matrix facilitates the translation of the required number of VAB specimens between different needle sizes and thereby eases the implementation of current guidelines and consensus recommendations into clinical practice. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; sample volume; vacuum-assisted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232187     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114549224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  The B3 conundrum-the radiologists' perspective.

Authors:  Nisha Sharma; Louise S Wilkinson; Sarah E Pinder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Satoko Nakano; Yoshimi Imawari; Akemi Mibu; Masahiko Otsuka; Toshinori Oinuma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Minimally Invasive Complete Response Assessment of the Breast After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Early Breast Cancer (MICRA trial): Interim Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ariane A van Loevezijn; Marieke E M van der Noordaa; Erik D van Werkhoven; Claudette E Loo; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Terry Wiersma; Koen K van de Vijver; Emilie J Groen; Charlotte F J M Blanken-Peeters; Bas J G L Zonneveld; Gabe S Sonke; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Development of nomograms to predict axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Jieqiong Liu; Shunrong Li; Lisa Jacobs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Rubina M Trimboli; Alexandra Athanasiou; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A T Baltzer; Maria Bernathova; Krisztina Borbély; Boris Brkljacic; Luca A Carbonaro; Paola Clauser; Enrico Cassano; Catherine Colin; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Eva M Fallenberg; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Michel Herranz; Karen Kinkel; Fleur Kilburn-Toppin; Christiane K Kuhl; Mihai Lesaru; Marc B I Lobbes; Ritse M Mann; Laura Martincich; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Simone Schiaffino; Tamar Sella; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Anne Tardivon; Chantal Van Ongeval; Matthew G Wallis; Sophia Zackrisson; Gabor Forrai; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-05

6.  A retrospective observational study of intraductal breast papilloma and its coexisting lesions: A real-world experience.

Authors:  Xiaona Li; Huan Wang; Zhe Sun; Chuifeng Fan; Feng Jin; Xiaoyun Mao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.