Literature DB >> 25232088

Risk factors for surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty.

Mohammad R Rasouli1, Camilo Restrepo1, Mitchell G Maltenfort1, James J Purtill1, Javad Parvizi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, most hospitals in the United States are obliged to report infections that occur following total joint arthroplasty to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors of surgical site infections that were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from a single institution.
METHODS: For this study, 6111 primary and revision total joint arthroplasties performed from April 2010 to June 2012 were identified. Surgical site infection cases captured by infection surveillance staff on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition were identified. Surgical site infection cases with index surgery performed at another institution were excluded. All cases were followed up for one year for development of surgical site infection. The model for predictors of surgical site infection was created by logistic regression and was validated by bootstrap resampling.
RESULTS: Of all performed total joint arthroplasties, surgical site infection developed in eighty cases (1.31% [95% confidence interval, 1.02% to 1.59%]). The highest rate of surgical site infection was observed in revision total knee arthroplasty (4.57% [95% confidence interval, 2.31% to 6.83%]) followed by revision total hip arthroplasty (1.94% [95% confidence interval, 0.75% to 3.13%]). Among the variables examined, the predictive factors of surgical site infection were higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio for a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥ 2, 2.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.94] and odds ratio for a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 4.10]), male sex (odds ratio, 1.79 [95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.89]), and revision total knee arthroplasty (odds ratio, 3.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 8.34]), and a higher level of preoperative hemoglobin (odds ratio, 0.85 per point [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.98 per point]) was protective against surgical site infection. The C-statistic of the model was 0.709 without correction and 0.678 after bootstrap correction, indicating that the model has fair predictive power.
CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative hemoglobin level is one of the risk factors for surgical site infection and preoperative correction of hemoglobin may reduce the likelihood of postoperative surgical site infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232088     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Closed suction drainage has no benefits in revision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Simcha G Fichman; Tatu J Mäkinen; Benjamin Lozano; Wael A Rahman; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross; David Backstein; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Meena; Shreesh Gangary; Pankaj Sharma; Buddhadev Chowdhury
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Reply to comments by Li et al.: "Do the specialist hip unit surgeons have no significant influence on reducing rates of surgical site infection?".

Authors:  Enrique Guerado; Juan Cano; Encarnacion Cruz; Maria Bertrand; Miguel Hirschfeld; Nicolas Benitez-Parejo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Do specialist hip unit surgeons have any significant influence on reducing rates of surgical site infection?

Authors:  Xiao-yang Li; Hui Li; Jie Bu; Tao Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What Is the Timing of General Health Adverse Events That Occur After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Bryce A Basques; Brett R Levine; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Infection risk assessment in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lazaros A Poultsides; Georgios K Triantafyllopoulos; Vasileios I Sakellariou; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Moderating effects of immunosuppressive medications and risk factors for post-operative joint infection following total joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Salt; Amanda T Wiggins; Mary Kay Rayens; Brent J Morris; David Mannino; Andrew Hoellein; Ryan P Donegan; Leslie J Crofford
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Does Preadmission Cutaneous Chlorhexidine Preparation Reduce Surgical Site Infections After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bhaveen H Kapadia; Peter L Zhou; Julio J Jauregui; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Surgical site infection in hand surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Na Lu; Sebastian Unizony; Hyon K Choi; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The John N. Insall Award: Do Intraarticular Injections Increase the Risk of Infection After TKA?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; Andrew J Pugely; Jacob M Elkins; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann; Steve S Liu; Yubo Gao; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.