Literature DB >> 25231924

Lymph node count and prognosis in colorectal cancer: the influence of examination quality.

Hendrik Bläker1, Bert Hildebrandt, Hanno Riess, Moritz von Winterfeld, Barbara Ingold-Heppner, Wilfried Roth, Matthias Kloor, Peter Schirmacher, Manfred Dietel, Sha Tao, Lina Jansen, Jenny Chang-Claude, Alexis Ulrich, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease when less than 12 lymph nodes are assessed. The recommendation bases on previous studies showing an association of a low lymph node count and adverse outcome. Compared to current standards, however, the quality of lymph node examination in the studies was low. We, therefore, investigated the prognostic role of <12 lymph nodes in cancers diagnosed adherent to current quality measures. Stage I-IV colorectal cancers from 1,899 patients enrolled into a population-based cohort study were investigated for the prognostic impact of a lymph node count <12. The stage specific share of patients diagnosed with ≥12 nodes (stage I-IV: 62, 85, 85, 78%, respectively) was used to compare lymph node examination quality to other studies. We found no impact of a lymph node count <12 on overall, cancer-specific or recurrence-free survival for any tumour stage. Compared to studies reporting an adverse prognostic impact of a low lymph node count in stages II and III the stage-specific shares of patients with ≥12 nodes were markedly higher in this study (85% vs. 24-58% in previous analyses) and this correlated with increased rates of stage III compared to stage II cancers. In conclusion our data indicate, that the previously reported effect of a low lymph node count on the patients' outcomes is eliminated by improved lymph node examination quality and thus question the general applicability of a 12 lymph node cut off for adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in stage II disease.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; lymph nodes; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231924     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  6 in total

1.  The association between microsatellite instability and lymph node count in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Arnold; Matthias Kloor; Lina Jansen; Jenny Chang-Claude; Hermann Brenner; Moritz von Winterfeld; Michael Hoffmeister; Hendrik Bläker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew Emmanuel; Amyn Haji
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Role of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in predicting outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C H A Lee; S Wilkins; K Oliva; M P Staples; P J McMurrick
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-08-08

4.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  A nomogram improves AJCC stages for colorectal cancers by introducing CEA, modified lymph node ratio and negative lymph node count.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Wei Gao; Qi-Feng Luo; Xiao-Wei Yin; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with ypT0-2 ypN0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital.

Authors:  Christian Galata; Kirsten Merx; Sabine Mai; Timo Gaiser; Frederik Wenz; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Karoline Horisberger
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.253

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.