Literature DB >> 25231696

[Subjective audiometric procedures in children].

M Ptok1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Before the era of objective audiometric procedures, the primary aim of subjective audiometric procedures was determination of the hearing threshold, e.g. to assess hearing aid indications. Nowadays, the results of objective audiometric procedures play a major role in hearing threshold determination in children. Contrastingly, subjective audiometric procedures are also employed in order to verify, or acquire an objective picture of, social hearing abnormalities evident from the children's anamneses.
METHODS: A selective literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases and current textbooks were also considered.
RESULTS: Subjective audiometric procedures for children employ both nonlinguistic and linguistic stimuli. Procedures can differ in many ways and it can be differentiated between, for example, observational or behavioural audiometry and procedures in which the children are explicitly instructed on how to react to signals. DISCUSSION: Several subjective audiometric procedures have been developed to examine the hearing and listening skills of children. Some of these tests differ significantly in terms of their intended application, test construction and test quality criteria. Only a detailed understanding of the particular subjective audiometric procedure being applied enables formulation of the"correct" questions; which, providing the child is willing to cooperate, can also be specifically answered using the test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231696     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2887-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Disorders of auditory processing and perception. Consensus statement].

Authors:  M Ptok; R Berger; C von Deuster; M Gross; A Lamprecht-Dinnesen; A Nickisch; H J Radü; V Uttenweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Signal detection theoretical aspects of various threshold detection procedures].

Authors:  M Ptok
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  [Decision processes at threshold levels during psychoacoustic testing].

Authors:  M Ptok
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.057

4.  [Evaluation of the Oldenburg children's rhyme test in silence and in noise].

Authors:  K C Wagener; T Brand; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Hearing aid fitting in children with difficulties processing auditory information-evaluation of parents' satisfaction].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Schwemmle
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  [The Mainz audiometric speech test for children (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Biesalski; H Leitner; E Leitner; D Gangel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. I. Speech audiometry of the young and retarded child by a picture-test (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Chilla; P Gabriel; P Kozielski; D Bänsch; M Kabas
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. II. Speech audiometry of the pre-school child with a monosyllabic picture-test (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Gabriel; R Chilla; C Kiese; M Kabas; D Bänsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  [Developmental dyslexia: the role of phonological processing for the development of literacy].

Authors:  M Ptok; K Berendes; S Gottal; B Grabherr; J Schneeberg; M Wittler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.

Authors:  G Parry; C Hacking; J Bamford; J Day
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.