Hamid Reza Baghani1, S Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri2, S Rabi Mahdavi3, Mostafa Robatjazi4, Arezo Rahim Zadeh5, Mohammad Esmail Akbari6, Hamid Reza Mirzaei6, Nahid Nafissi6, Majid Samsami6. 1. Department of Radiation Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University, Daneshjoo St, Velenjak 1983963113, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Radiation Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University, Daneshjoo St, Velenjak 1983963113, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: smr-aghamiri@sbu.ac.ir. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Science, Hemmat Exp.Way 14496141525, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Science, Poursina St 1417614411, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Medical Radiation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Hesark Blvd 1477893855, Tehran, Iran. 6. Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Shahrdari St 1985717443, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quality assurance (QA) is one of the most important issues that should be addressed for intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), which is not benefiting from image-based treatment planning system. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of Gafchromic EBT2 film for breast IOERT QA procedure. METHODS: Due to the fact that some dedicated accelerators are being used for IOERT, dependence of the film response to energy, field size, dose rate and incidence angle of electron beam from the LIAC IOERT accelerator was studied. Then, film response curve to breast IOERT doses was obtained and its accuracy was evaluated and justified through comparison to the results of ionometric dosimetry. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that there are no significant differences between the film responses at different energies of 6, 8, 10 and 12 MeV (P-value = 0.99). Similarly, no field size dependency was found when evaluating the response of the film to different field sizes ranging from 4 to 10 cm (P-value = 0.94). Film response was found to be independent of the dose rate of intraoperative electron beam (P-value = 0.12). Film response variations with changing the beam incidence angle were not significant (P-value > 0.8). Calibration curve at the dose range of 8-24 Gy had an acceptable accuracy. The difference between the results of film dosimetry and ionometric dosimetry was around 5% which was in agreement with the results of dose uncertainty estimation. CONCLUSION: The EBT2 film was found to be a potentially appropriate tool for breast IOERT verification.
PURPOSE: Quality assurance (QA) is one of the most important issues that should be addressed for intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), which is not benefiting from image-based treatment planning system. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of Gafchromic EBT2 film for breast IOERT QA procedure. METHODS: Due to the fact that some dedicated accelerators are being used for IOERT, dependence of the film response to energy, field size, dose rate and incidence angle of electron beam from the LIAC IOERT accelerator was studied. Then, film response curve to breast IOERT doses was obtained and its accuracy was evaluated and justified through comparison to the results of ionometric dosimetry. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that there are no significant differences between the film responses at different energies of 6, 8, 10 and 12 MeV (P-value = 0.99). Similarly, no field size dependency was found when evaluating the response of the film to different field sizes ranging from 4 to 10 cm (P-value = 0.94). Film response was found to be independent of the dose rate of intraoperative electron beam (P-value = 0.12). Film response variations with changing the beam incidence angle were not significant (P-value > 0.8). Calibration curve at the dose range of 8-24 Gy had an acceptable accuracy. The difference between the results of film dosimetry and ionometric dosimetry was around 5% which was in agreement with the results of dose uncertainty estimation. CONCLUSION: The EBT2 film was found to be a potentially appropriate tool for breast IOERT verification.
Authors: Beong Ik Hur; Seong Jin Jin; Gyeong Rip Kim; Jong Hyeok Kwak; Young Ha Kim; Sang Weon Lee; Soon Ki Sung Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc Date: 2021-01-01