Literature DB >> 25231416

Ecology of grazing lawns in Africa.

Gareth P Hempson1,2, Sally Archibald3,4, William J Bond1,5, Roger P Ellis2, Cornelia C Grant6,7, Fred J Kruger2,8, Laurence M Kruger1,2, Courtney Moxley1, Norman Owen-Smith3, Mike J S Peel3,9, Izak P J Smit3,6, Karen J Vickers2.   

Abstract

Grazing lawns are a distinct grassland community type, characterised by short-stature and with their persistence and spread promoted by grazing. In Africa, they reveal a long co-evolutionary history of grasses and large mammal grazers. The attractiveness to grazers of a low-biomass sward lies in the relatively high quality of forage, largely due to the low proportion of stem material in the sward; this encourages repeat grazing that concomitantly suppresses tall-grass growth forms that would otherwise outcompete lawn species for light. Regular grazing that prevents shading and maintains sward quality is thus the cornerstone of grazing lawn dynamics. The strong interplay between abiotic conditions and disturbance factors, which are central to grazing lawn existence, can also cause these systems to be highly dynamic. Here we identify differences in growth form among grazing lawn grass species, and assess how compositional differences among lawn types, as well as environmental variables, influence their maintenance requirements (i.e. grazing frequency) and vulnerability to degradation. We also make a clear distinction between the processes of lawn establishment and lawn maintenance. Rainfall, soil nutrient status, grazer community composition and fire regime have strong and interactive influences on both processes. However, factors that concentrate grazing pressure (e.g. nutrient hotspots and sodic sites) have more bearing on where lawns establish. Similarly, we discuss the relevance of enhanced rates of nitrogen cycling and of sodium levels to lawn maintenance. Grazer community composition and density has considerable significance to grazing lawn dynamics; not all grazers are adapted to foraging on short-grass swards, and differences in body size and relative mouth dimensions determine which species are able to convert tall-grass swards into grazing lawns under different conditions. Hence, we evaluate the roles of different grazers in lawn dynamics, as well as the benefits that grazer populations derive from having access to grazing lawns. The effects of grazing lawns can extend well beyond their borders, due to their influence on grazer densities, behaviour and movements as well as fire spread, intensity and frequency. Variation in the area and proportion of a landscape that is grazing lawn can thus have a profound impact on system dynamics. We provide a conceptual model that summarises grazing lawn dynamics, and identify a rainfall range where we predict grazing lawns to be most prevalent. We also examine the biodiversity associated with grazing lawn systems, and consider their functional contribution to the conservation of this biodiversity. Finally, we assess the utility of grazing lawns as a resource in a rangeland context.
© 2014 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African grazing systems; biodiversity; grass growth forms; grassland; grazer; megaherbivore; nitrogen cycling; rangeland; savanna; sodium

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231416     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  18 in total

1.  Fire spread and the issue of community-level selection in the evolution of flammability.

Authors:  Emmanuel Schertzer; A Carla Staver
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Soil biological responses to, and feedbacks on, trophic rewilding.

Authors:  W S Andriuzzi; D H Wall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Diverse effects of the common hippopotamus on plant communities and soil chemistry.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Stuart I Graham; Todd E Dawson; Mary E Power; Mordecai Ogada; Wanja D Nyingi; John M Githaiga; Judith Nyunja; Lacey F Hughey; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predators and rainfall control spatial biogeochemistry in a landscape of fear.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Early hominins evolved within non-analog ecosystems.

Authors:  J Tyler Faith; John Rowan; Andrew Du
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Animal body size distribution influences the ratios of nutrients supplied to plants.

Authors:  Elizabeth le Roux; Laura S van Veenhuisen; Graham I H Kerley; Joris P G M Cromsigt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Competing consumers: contrasting the patterns and impacts of fire and mammalian herbivory in Africa.

Authors:  Sally Archibald; Gareth P Hempson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions.

Authors:  Erick J Lundgren; Daniel Ramp; John Rowan; Owen Middleton; Simon D Schowanek; Oscar Sanisidro; Scott P Carroll; Matt Davis; Christopher J Sandom; Jens-Christian Svenning; Arian D Wallach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The consequences of replacing wildlife with livestock in Africa.

Authors:  Gareth P Hempson; Sally Archibald; William J Bond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Grassland structural heterogeneity in a savanna is driven more by productivity differences than by consumption differences between lawn and bunch grasses.

Authors:  Michiel P Veldhuis; Heleen F Fakkert; Matty P Berg; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.