Literature DB >> 25231022

Ecological assessments of surface water bodies at the river basin level: a case study from England.

Alexandra Collins1, Nikolaos Voulvoulis.   

Abstract

Ecological assessments of surface water bodies are essential in order to evaluate the level of degradation in freshwater ecosystems and to address the subsequent decline in services they provide. These assessments cover multiple aspects of the aquatic environment, particularly biological elements due to their ability to respond to all pressures within an ecosystem. Such assessments can enable the identification of the multiple pressures which threaten water bodies, facilitating sustainable decisions regarding their management to be identified. Here, the design requirements of the networks which facilitate ecological assessments are presented. A river basin district in England is used as a case study to investigate the number of elements monitored, the number of failing elements and the relationship between failing elements. Findings demonstrate the value of ensuring that monitoring networks are risk based and appropriately designed to meet their objectives. This therefore requires that monitoring is not only for the communicating of compliance but also for use iteratively so that the design of monitoring networks and ultimately management can be continually improved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231022     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-4033-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  Strategies used to guide the design and implementation of a national river monitoring programme in South Africa.

Authors:  D J Roux
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review.

Authors:  Vincent Carignan; Marc-André Villard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe.

Authors:  J L Metcalfe
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Daniel Hering; Angel Borja; Jacob Carstensen; Laurence Carvalho; Mike Elliott; Christian K Feld; Anna-Stiina Heiskanen; Richard K Johnson; Jannicke Moe; Didier Pont; Anne Lyche Solheim; Wouter van de Bund
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Gene E Likens
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Framework for designing sampling programs.

Authors:  W A Maher; P W Cullen; R H Norris
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Big projects, big problems.

Authors:  B Zeide
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Integrated monitoring of South Portugal water bodies: a methodology towards WFD.

Authors:  F A Martins; J Janeiro; S Gabriel; A Venâncio; R Neves
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Benchmarking inference methods for water quality monitoring and status classification.

Authors:  Hoseung Jung; Cornelius Senf; Philip Jordan; Tobias Krueger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.