PURPOSE: To compare the cytotoxicity of povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I) with that of polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution (PAI) for ophthalmic use. METHODS: Cells of the human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T were exposed to various dilutions of PVP-I or PAI, and the cytotoxicity of these two antiseptics was evaluated. The relative toxicities of PVP-I and PAI were also investigated following the inactivation of iodine by achromatization with sodium thiosulfate. RESULTS: PVP-I and PAI had equivalent antiseptic effects, but the cytotoxicity of PVP-I diluted 16-fold was higher than that of PAI diluted 6-fold. Following inactivation of iodine with sodium thiosulfate, the cytotoxicity of PVP-I remained concentration dependent, whereas PAI exhibited a low toxicity that was similar to the effect of saline on cell viability. Exposure to lauromacrogol, a surfactant used in PVP-I, in solution at concentrations of 1-1000 mg/mL clearly resulted in corneal cytotoxicity. The PVP-I and PAI solutions had a pH value of 4.0 and 5.2, respectively. HCE-T cells were significantly more viable at pH 7 than at pH 1-6. CONCLUSION: To avoid corneal damage, preoperative antisepsis of the surgical field should be accomplished with PAI diluted 6-fold, rather than with PVP-I diluted 16-fold. The toxicity of the iodine compound stems primarily from the available iodine concentration and partly from its pH, surfactant and osmolality. Further clinical investigations are required in order to determine the optimal concentrations for use.
PURPOSE: To compare the cytotoxicity of povidone-iodine solution (PVP-I) with that of polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution (PAI) for ophthalmic use. METHODS: Cells of the human corneal epithelial cell line HCE-T were exposed to various dilutions of PVP-I or PAI, and the cytotoxicity of these two antiseptics was evaluated. The relative toxicities of PVP-I and PAI were also investigated following the inactivation of iodine by achromatization with sodium thiosulfate. RESULTS:PVP-I and PAI had equivalent antiseptic effects, but the cytotoxicity of PVP-I diluted 16-fold was higher than that of PAI diluted 6-fold. Following inactivation of iodine with sodium thiosulfate, the cytotoxicity of PVP-I remained concentration dependent, whereas PAI exhibited a low toxicity that was similar to the effect of saline on cell viability. Exposure to lauromacrogol, a surfactant used in PVP-I, in solution at concentrations of 1-1000 mg/mL clearly resulted in corneal cytotoxicity. The PVP-I and PAI solutions had a pH value of 4.0 and 5.2, respectively. HCE-T cells were significantly more viable at pH 7 than at pH 1-6. CONCLUSION: To avoid corneal damage, preoperative antisepsis of the surgical field should be accomplished with PAI diluted 6-fold, rather than with PVP-I diluted 16-fold. The toxicity of the iodine compound stems primarily from the available iodine concentration and partly from its pH, surfactant and osmolality. Further clinical investigations are required in order to determine the optimal concentrations for use.
Authors: K Araki-Sasaki; Y Ohashi; T Sasabe; K Hayashi; H Watanabe; Y Tano; H Handa Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Keith M Olsen; Trish M Perl; Paul G Auwaerter; Maureen K Bolon; Douglas N Fish; Lena M Napolitano; Robert G Sawyer; Douglas Slain; James P Steinberg; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: William Swift; Jeffrey A Bair; Wanxue Chen; Michael Li; Sole Lie; Dayu Li; Menglu Yang; Marie A Shatos; Robin R Hodges; Miriam Kolko; Tor P Utheim; Wendell Scott; Darlene A Dartt Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2020-09-16