Literature DB >> 25229274

Health effects of supplemental work from home in the European Union.

Anna Arlinghaus1, Friedhelm Nachreiner.   

Abstract

Internationalization and technological developments have changed the work organization in developed and developing industrial economies. Information and communication technologies, such as computers and smartphones, are increasingly used, allowing more temporal and spatial flexibility of work. This may lead to an increase in supplemental work, i.e. constant availability or working in addition to contractually agreed work hours. This in turn extends work hours and leads to work hours in evenings and weekends, causing interferences of work hours with biological and social rhythms for sleep, recovery and social interaction. However, empirical findings on the effects of supplemental work and work hours on occupational health are rather scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between (1) work-related contacts outside of regular work hours and (2) working in the free time with self-reported work-related health impairments in the fourth and fifth European Working Conditions Surveys (EWCS 2005, EWCS 2010). Out of these cross-sectional, large-scale surveys, data on n = 22 836 and n = 34 399 employed workers were used for weighted logistic regression analyses. About half of the sample reported at least occasional supplemental work. The results showed an increased risk of reporting at least one health problem for employees who had been contacted by their employer (EWCS 2005), or worked in their free time to meet work demands (EWCS 2010) in the last 12 months, compared to those reporting no supplemental work or work-related contacts during free time. These results were controlled for demographic variables, physical and mental work load, worker autonomy, and several work hours characteristics (e.g. hours per week, unusual and variable hours). The risk of reporting health problems was increased by being contacted both sometimes (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14-1.39) and often (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25), whereas the frequency of working in the free time showed a clear dose-response effect (sometimes: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.24; often: OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.47-1.75), both compared to the category "never". The findings, thus, indicate that even a small amount of supplemental work beyond contractually agreed work hours may increase the risk of work-related health impairments. Working in the free time was associated with a substantial risk increase and might be a better indicator for actual work load than being contacted by the employer outside of contractually agreed work hours. Thus, in order to minimize negative health effects, availability requirements for employees outside their regular work hours should be minimized. While these effects definitely need further study, especially regarding a quantification of actual supplemental work and its temporal location, addressing the company culture and using incentives and policies might be options to reduce the amount of supplemental work and maintain the risks of health impairments in the working population at a lower level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constant availability; occupational health; recovery; work hours; work organization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25229274     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2014.957297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  11 in total

1.  The Effects of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak on Academic Staff Members: A Case Study of a Pharmacy School in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Dalia Almaghaslah; Abdulrhman Alsayari
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Boundaryless working hours and recovery in Germany.

Authors:  Laura Vieten; Anne Marit Wöhrmann; Alexandra Michel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Occupational Health Problems and Lifestyle Changes Among Novice Working-From-Home Workers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Chatchai Ekpanyaskul; Chantana Padungtod
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2021-02-06

4.  Work e-mail after hours and off-job duration and their association with psychological detachment, actigraphic sleep, and saliva cortisol: A 1-month observational study for information technology employees.

Authors:  Tomohide Kubo; Shuhei Izawa; Hiroki Ikeda; Masao Tsuchiya; Keiichi Miki; Masaya Takahashi
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Developing a mental health index using a machine learning approach: Assessing the impact of mobility and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Krishnadas Nanath; Sreejith Balasubramanian; Vinaya Shukla; Nazrul Islam; Supriya Kaitheri
Journal:  Technol Forecast Soc Change       Date:  2022-02-14

6.  Telework satisfaction, wellbeing and performance in the digital era. Lessons learned during COVID-19 lockdown in Spain.

Authors:  Joanna Blahopoulou; Silvia Ortiz-Bonnin; Maribel Montañez-Juan; Gema Torrens Espinosa; M Esther García-Buades
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-02-20

7.  Working at home and expectations of being available: effects on perceived work environment, turnover intentions, and health.

Authors:  Stein Knardahl; Jan Olav Christensen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.492

8.  Determining the research status and coronavirus anxiety scores of academics during the flexible working arrangements initiated after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Deniz Akyildiz; Serife Durna
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 9.  Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence-based effects of shift work and non-standard working hours on workers, family and community.

Authors:  Anna Arlinghaus; Philip Bohle; Irena Iskra-Golec; Nicole Jansen; Sarah Jay; Lucia Rotenberg
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.179

10.  Telecommuting, Off-Time Work, and Intrusive Leadership in Workers' Well-Being.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita; Giovanni Tripepi; Carlo Chiorri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.