Wesam G Ammari1, Zainab Al-Qadhi1, Mohammad Khalil2, Rabab Tayyem2, Samir Qammaz1, Ghaleb Oriquat1, Iman A Basheti3, Henry Chrystyn4. 1. 1School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. 2. 2ACDIMA Centre for Bioequivalence and Pharmaceutical Studies, Amman, Jordan. 3. 3School of Pharmacy, Applied Sciences University, Amman, Jordan. 4. 4School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indacaterol is a novel once-a-day inhaled ultra-long-acting β2-agonist. Quantitative bioanalysis supports pharmacokinetic and clinical research. The aim of the current work was to validate an in-house developed high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analytical method for indacaterol determination in human urine samples. METHODS: A liquid-liquid extraction method has been developed to extract indacaterol from human urine samples using ethyl acetate. Indacaterol dry extract was reconstituted with 200 μL of the mobile phase (acidified water:methanol (30:70, v/v)) of which 5 μL was needed for the HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Indacaterol was eluted on a reversed C18 stationary phase with an isocratic mobile phase at a flow of 1 mL/min. Formoterol was the internal standard (IS). The MS/MS detection was employed with a turbo-ion spray ionization in the positive ion mode. A consensus of the international Guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation was followed. RESULTS: Indacaterol was detected at a mass to charge ratio (m/z) of 393.3 and its MS/MS daughter at 173.2. The retention times of indacaterol and IS were 1.60 and 1.20 min, respectively. Validated calibration curves were linear over a range of 0.075-100 ng/mL with correlation coefficients (r)≥0.990. The curves' regression weighting factor was 1/x. Method specificity was established in six different human urine batches. No matrix interference was observed. The intra- and inter-batch precision and accuracy within±20% (at lower limit) and±15% (other quality control (QC) levels) were confirmed. The indacaterol mean recovery (precision) percentages at Low, Mid, and High QC levels were 93.5 (3.84), 89.8 (2.15), and 92.2 (2.17), respectively. Short-term, long-term, freeze-thaw, and auto-sampler stability results were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: A specific, accurate and precise HPLC-MS/MS method has been validated for indacaterol quantification in human urine. This simple method is reproducible and robust to support future, indacaterol-related pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence and clinical studies.
BACKGROUND:Indacaterol is a novel once-a-day inhaled ultra-long-acting β2-agonist. Quantitative bioanalysis supports pharmacokinetic and clinical research. The aim of the current work was to validate an in-house developed high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analytical method for indacaterol determination in human urine samples. METHODS: A liquid-liquid extraction method has been developed to extract indacaterol from human urine samples using ethyl acetate. Indacaterol dry extract was reconstituted with 200 μL of the mobile phase (acidified water:methanol (30:70, v/v)) of which 5 μL was needed for the HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Indacaterol was eluted on a reversed C18 stationary phase with an isocratic mobile phase at a flow of 1 mL/min. Formoterol was the internal standard (IS). The MS/MS detection was employed with a turbo-ion spray ionization in the positive ion mode. A consensus of the international Guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation was followed. RESULTS:Indacaterol was detected at a mass to charge ratio (m/z) of 393.3 and its MS/MS daughter at 173.2. The retention times of indacaterol and IS were 1.60 and 1.20 min, respectively. Validated calibration curves were linear over a range of 0.075-100 ng/mL with correlation coefficients (r)≥0.990. The curves' regression weighting factor was 1/x. Method specificity was established in six different human urine batches. No matrix interference was observed. The intra- and inter-batch precision and accuracy within±20% (at lower limit) and±15% (other quality control (QC) levels) were confirmed. The indacaterol mean recovery (precision) percentages at Low, Mid, and High QC levels were 93.5 (3.84), 89.8 (2.15), and 92.2 (2.17), respectively. Short-term, long-term, freeze-thaw, and auto-sampler stability results were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: A specific, accurate and precise HPLC-MS/MS method has been validated for indacaterol quantification in human urine. This simple method is reproducible and robust to support future, indacaterol-related pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence and clinical studies.