Literature DB >> 25227898

A dosimetric comparison of ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Thomas P Kole1, R Charles Nichols, Song Lei, Binbin Wu, Soon N Huh, Christopher G Morris, Sang Lee, Michael Tong, Nancy P Mendenhall, Anatoly Dritschilo, Sean P Collins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared target and normal tissue dosimetric indices between ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients were treated definitively for localized prostate cancer with SBRT to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to a volume encompassing the prostate only. Dose-volume constraints were applied to the rectum, bladder, penile bulb, femoral heads, and prostatic and membranous urethra. Three-field passively scattered proton plans were retrospectively generated using target volumes from the same patients. Dosimetric indices were compared between the SBRT and proton plans using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: All dose constraints were achieved using both ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton and SBRT planning. Proton plans demonstrated significant improvement over SBRT in mean dose delivered to the penile bulb (5.2 CGE vs. 11.4 Gy; p=0.002), rectum (6.7 CGE vs. 10.6 Gy; p=0.002), and membranous urethra (32.2 CGE vs. 34.4 Gy; p=0.006) with improved target homogeneity resulting in a significant reduction in hot spots and volumes of tissue exposed to low doses of radiation. Compared to proton planning, SBRT planning resulted in significant improvement in target conformality with a mean index of 1.17 versus 1.72 (p=0.002), resulting in a dose reduction to the volume of bladder receiving more than 90% of the PD (V32.6, 7.5% vs. 15.9%; p=0.01) and mean dose to the left (7.1 Gy vs. 10.4 CGE; p=0.004) and right (4.0 Gy vs. 10.9 CGE; p=0.01) femoral heads.
CONCLUSION: Target and normal tissue dose constraints for ultra-hypofractionated definitive radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer are readily achieved using both CK SBRT and passively scattered proton-based therapy suggesting feasibility of either modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227898     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.953260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.

Authors:  Lee C Goddard; N Patrik Brodin; William R Bodner; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Proton versus photon-based radiation therapy for prostate cancer: emerging evidence and considerations in the era of value-based cancer care.

Authors:  Sophia C Kamran; Jay O Light; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Sophie Mangan; Michelle Leech
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Dorota Maria Borowicz; Konstantin N Shipulin; Gennady V Mytsin; Agnieszka Skrobała; Piotr Milecki; Victor N Gayevsky; Vladimir Vondráček; Julian Malicki
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.