PURPOSE: Abbreviation of paced QRS duration has been taken as electrical resynchronization imposed by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, little is known about alteration in native QRS duration and its correlation with therapeutic response as well as anatomical remodeling post-CRT. METHODS: Data of 74 consecutive patients with complete ECG records were reviewed. Response was defined as absolute improvement in LVEF by ≥10% from baseline. Changes in native QRS duration (native ΔQRS) were analyzed to CRT response and to changes in echocardiography. RESULTS: Over median follow-up of 13 months, 47 patients had response to CRT and 30 subjects had abbreviation in native QRS duration. Native ΔQRS correlated positively with QRS duration pre- and post-CRT as well as with changes in echocardiography. Reversal of electrical remodeling as assessed by native QRS narrowing accompanied with greater improvements in LVEF (20% ± 11% vs 10% ± 10%, p = 0.000) and LVEDD (14 ± 11 mm vs. 4 ± 10 mm, p = 0.000). Multivariate analysis indicated that native ΔQRS was the lone independent factor of ECG in association to response to CRT (OR1.049, 95%CI 1.015-1.085, p = 0.004): 83.3% of patients with native QRS reduction were responders. Among the non-responders, 18.5% had native QRS narrowing at follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Native QRS narrowing associated with beneficial response and greater improvements in echocardiography. Abbreviation in native QRS duration could reflect electrical reversal imposed by CRT.
PURPOSE: Abbreviation of paced QRS duration has been taken as electrical resynchronization imposed by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, little is known about alteration in native QRS duration and its correlation with therapeutic response as well as anatomical remodeling post-CRT. METHODS: Data of 74 consecutive patients with complete ECG records were reviewed. Response was defined as absolute improvement in LVEF by ≥10% from baseline. Changes in native QRS duration (native ΔQRS) were analyzed to CRT response and to changes in echocardiography. RESULTS: Over median follow-up of 13 months, 47 patients had response to CRT and 30 subjects had abbreviation in native QRS duration. Native ΔQRS correlated positively with QRS duration pre- and post-CRT as well as with changes in echocardiography. Reversal of electrical remodeling as assessed by native QRS narrowing accompanied with greater improvements in LVEF (20% ± 11% vs 10% ± 10%, p = 0.000) and LVEDD (14 ± 11 mm vs. 4 ± 10 mm, p = 0.000). Multivariate analysis indicated that native ΔQRS was the lone independent factor of ECG in association to response to CRT (OR1.049, 95%CI 1.015-1.085, p = 0.004): 83.3% of patients with native QRS reduction were responders. Among the non-responders, 18.5% had native QRS narrowing at follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Native QRS narrowing associated with beneficial response and greater improvements in echocardiography. Abbreviation in native QRS duration could reflect electrical reversal imposed by CRT.
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cheuk-Man Yu; Yat-Sun Chan; Qing Zhang; Gabriel W K Yip; Chi-Kin Chan; Leo C C Kum; LiWen Wu; Alex Pui-Wai Lee; Yat-Yin Lam; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sunthareth Yeim; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Julien Laborderie; Mark D O'Neill; Stephane Lafitte; Antoine Deplagne; Stephane Garrigue; Raymond Roudaut; Pierre Jais; Michel Haissaguerre; Pierre Dossantos; Jacques Clementy Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Michael R Gold; Christophe Thébault; Cecilia Linde; William T Abraham; Bart Gerritse; Stefano Ghio; Martin St John Sutton; Jean-Claude Daubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Vogt; O Krahnefeld; B Lamp; B Hansky; H Kirkels; K Minami; R Körfer; D Horstkotte; M Kloss; A Auricchio Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2000-11-02 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: John Rickard; Alan Cheng; David Spragg; Daniel Cantillon; Mina K Chung; W H Wilson Tang; Bruce L Wilkoff; Niraj Varma Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Mark A Iler; Tingfei Hu; Sunil Ayyagari; Thomas D Callahan; Kenneth C Civello; Sergio G Thal; Bruce L Wilkoff; Mina K Chung Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: John Rickard; Gregory Jackson; David D Spragg; Edmond M Cronin; Bryan Baranowski; W H Wilson Tang; Bruce L Wilkoff; Niraj Varma Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 6.343