Jia-Guo Zhao1, Shi-Lian Kan2, Li Zhao2, Zeng-Liang Wang2, Lei Long2, Jia Wang2, Cong-Cong Liang2. 1. Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery, Orthopaedic Radiology, and Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Clinical College of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. Electronic address: orthopaedic@163.com. 2. Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery, Orthopaedic Radiology, and Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Clinical College of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the overall success rate and potential influencing factors within the current evidence for percutaneous first annular pulley release. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical studies of percutaneous release. The rates of successful procedure and complication were extracted and analyzed. We charted the overall success rate on a forest plot with 95% confidence intervals. Data of success rates were analyzed in 5- and 10-year intervals to determine whether the rate of success had increased chronologically. We then performed 3 subgroup analyses according to instrument type (needles vs knife blades), cortisone use (cortisone vs noncortisone), and sonography guidance (sonography vs non-sonography guidance). Pooled success rates were calculated in the subgroups and compared using chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies involving 2,114 percutaneous procedures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The total success rate was 94%. There was a trend toward increasing number of publications in the past 20 years. We found a statistically significant trend showing that overall success rates had increased over time. Chi-square test revealed that percutaneous release with sonography guidance had a significantly higher success rate than non-sonography guidance. There were no significant differences in other subgroup analyses including instrument type and cortisone use. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous release is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of trigger digit. It has become progressively popular in recent years, with a trend toward increased overall success. Sonography might be a helpful tool for maximizing success. The success rates were not affected by instruments and cortisone use. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
PURPOSE: To determine the overall success rate and potential influencing factors within the current evidence for percutaneous first annular pulley release. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical studies of percutaneous release. The rates of successful procedure and complication were extracted and analyzed. We charted the overall success rate on a forest plot with 95% confidence intervals. Data of success rates were analyzed in 5- and 10-year intervals to determine whether the rate of success had increased chronologically. We then performed 3 subgroup analyses according to instrument type (needles vs knife blades), cortisone use (cortisone vs noncortisone), and sonography guidance (sonography vs non-sonography guidance). Pooled success rates were calculated in the subgroups and compared using chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies involving 2,114 percutaneous procedures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The total success rate was 94%. There was a trend toward increasing number of publications in the past 20 years. We found a statistically significant trend showing that overall success rates had increased over time. Chi-square test revealed that percutaneous release with sonography guidance had a significantly higher success rate than non-sonography guidance. There were no significant differences in other subgroup analyses including instrument type and cortisone use. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous release is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of trigger digit. It has become progressively popular in recent years, with a trend toward increased overall success. Sonography might be a helpful tool for maximizing success. The success rates were not affected by instruments and cortisone use. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Authors: Luca Maria Sconfienza; Miraude Adriaensen; Domenico Albano; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alberto Bazzocchi; Ian Beggs; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Angelo Corazza; Danoob Dalili; Miriam De Dea; Jose Luis Del Cura; Francesco Di Pietto; Eleni Drakonaki; Fernando Facal de Castro; Dimitrios Filippiadis; Jan Gielen; Salvatore Gitto; Harun Gupta; Andrea S Klauser; Radhesh Lalam; Silvia Martin; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Catherine McCarthy; Eugene McNally; Kalliopi Melaki; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Benedikt Neubauer; Marina Obradov; Cyprian Olchowy; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Raquel Prada Gonzalez; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Alexander Talaska; Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Federico Zaottini; Marcello Zappia; Georgina Allen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Angelika Maria Schwarz; Georg Lipnik; Ulrike Maria Schwarz; Marco Johannes Maier; Andreas Heinrich Weiglein; Gloria Maria Hohenberger Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 1.251