| Literature DB >> 25227141 |
Dina Vojinovic1, Hieab H H Adams2, Sven J van der Lee3, Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas3, Rutger Brouwer4, Mirjam C G N van den Hout4, Edwin Oole4, Jeroen van Rooij5, Andre Uitterlinden6, Albert Hofman3, Wilfred F J van IJcken4, Annemieke Aartsma-Rus7, GertJan B van Ommen8, M Arfan Ikram9, Cornelia M van Duijn10, Najaf Amin3.
Abstract
The aim of our study is to investigate whether single-nucleotide dystrophin gene (DMD) variants associate with variability in cognitive functions in healthy populations. The study included 1240 participants from the Erasmus Rucphen family (ERF) study and 1464 individuals from the Rotterdam Study (RS). The participants whose exomes were sequenced and who were assessed for various cognitive traits were included in the analysis. To determine the association between DMD variants and cognitive ability, linear (mixed) modeling with adjustment for age, sex and education was used. Moreover, Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT) was used to test the overall association of the rare genetic variants present in the DMD with cognitive traits. Although no DMD variant surpassed the prespecified significance threshold (P<1 × 10(-4)), rs147546024:A>G showed strong association (β = 1.786, P-value = 2.56 × 10(-4)) with block-design test in the ERF study, while another variant rs1800273:G>A showed suggestive association (β = -0.465, P-value = 0.002) with Mini-Mental State Examination test in the RS. Both variants are highly conserved, although rs147546024:A>G is an intronic variant, whereas rs1800273:G>A is a missense variant in the DMD which has a predicted damaging effect on the protein. Further gene-based analysis of DMD revealed suggestive association (P-values = 0.087 and 0.074) with general cognitive ability in both cohorts. In conclusion, both single variant and gene-based analyses suggest the existence of variants in the DMD which may affect cognitive functioning in the general populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25227141 PMCID: PMC4795046 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246