Literature DB >> 25227136

Glasgow coma scale motor score and pupillary reaction to predict six-month mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: comparison of field and admission assessment.

Marek Majdan1, Ewout W Steyerberg, Daan Nieboer, Walter Mauritz, Martin Rusnak, Hester F Lingsma.   

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupillary reactivity are well-known prognostic factors in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to compare the GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at hospital admission and assess their prognostic value for 6-month mortality in patients with moderate or severe TBI. We studied 445 patients with moderate or severe TBI from Austria enrolled to hospital in 2009-2012. The area under the curve (AUC) and Nagelkerke's R(2) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity assessed in the field and at admission. Uni- and multi-variable analyses-adjusting for age, other clinical, and computed tomography findings-were performed using combinations of field and admission GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity. Motor scores generally deteriorated from the field to admission, whereas pupillary reactivity was similar. GCS motor score assessed in field (AUC=0.754; R(2)=0.273) and pupillary assessment at admission (AUC=0.662; R(2)=0.214) performed best as predictors of 6-month mortality in the univariate analysis. This combination also showed best performance in the adjusted analyses (AUC=0.876; R(2)=0.508), but the performance of both predictors assessed at admission was not much worse (AUC=0.857; R(2)=0.460). Field GCS motor score and pupillary reactivity at hospital admission, compared to other combinations of these parameters, possess the best prognostic value to predict 6-month mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Given that differences in prognostic performance are only small, both the field and admission values of GCS motor score and pupillary reaction may be reasonable to use in multi-variable prediction models to predict 6-month outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow Coma Scale; assessment at admission; prehospital assessment; pupillary reactivity; traumatic brain injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227136      PMCID: PMC4291088          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  20 in total

Review 1.  The status of the Glasgow Coma Scale.

Authors:  Belinda J Gabbe; Peter A Cameron; Caroline F Finch
Journal:  Emerg Med (Fremantle)       Date:  2003-08

2.  Efficacy of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale in trauma triage.

Authors:  S E Ross; C Leipold; C Terregino; K F O'Malley
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-07

3.  Prehospital neurologic deterioration is independent predictor of outcome in traumatic brain injury: analysis from National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Shahram Majidi; Farhan Siddiq; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor.

Authors:  C Healey; Turner M Osler; Frederick B Rogers; Mark A Healey; Laurent G Glance; Patrick D Kilgo; Steven R Shackford; J Wayne Meredith
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-04

6.  Brain stem blood flow, pupillary response, and outcome in patients with severe head injuries.

Authors:  A M Ritter; J P Muizelaar; T Barnes; S Choi; P Fatouros; J Ward; M R Bullock
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Inaccurate early assessment of neurological severity in head injury.

Authors:  Nino Stocchetti; Francesca Pagan; Emiliana Calappi; Katia Canavesi; Luigi Beretta; Giuseppe Citerio; Manuela Cormio; Angelo Colombo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  A comparison of prehospital and hospital data in trauma patients.

Authors:  Saman Arbabi; Gregory J Jurkovich; Wendy L Wahl; Glen A Franklin; Mark R Hemmila; Paul A Taheri; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-05

10.  Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years.

Authors:  M Balestreri; M Czosnyka; D A Chatfield; L A Steiner; E A Schmidt; P Smielewski; B Matta; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  12 in total

1.  Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Sonja Stutzman; Ciji Saju; Margaret Wilson; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Glasgow Coma Scale Score Fluctuations are Inversely Associated With a NIRS-based Index of Cerebral Autoregulation in Acutely Comatose Patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Healy; Andres Zorrilla-Vaca; Wendy Ziai; Marek A Mirski; Charles W Hogue; Romergryko Geocadin; Batya Radzik; Caitlin Palmisano; Lucia Rivera-Lara
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.956

3.  Initial CT-based radiomics nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter development and validation study.

Authors:  Rui-Zhe Zheng; Zhi-Jie Zhao; Xi-Tao Yang; Shao-Wei Jiang; Yong-de Li; Wen-Jie Li; Xiu-Hui Li; Yue Zhou; Cheng-Jin Gao; Yan-Bin Ma; Shu-Ming Pan; Yang Wang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Neurological Pupil Index for the Early Prediction of Outcome in Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Federico Romagnosi; Adriano Bernini; Filippo Bongiovanni; Carolina Iaquaniello; John-Paul Miroz; Giuseppe Citerio; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Mauro Oddo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Outcome Prediction after Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of the Performance of Routinely Used Severity Scores and Multivariable Prognostic Models.

Authors:  Marek Majdan; Alexandra Brazinova; Martin Rusnak; Johannes Leitgeb
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Cardiac arrest after severe traumatic brain injury can be survivable with good outcomes.

Authors:  Zirun Zhao; Justine J Liang; Zhe Wang; Nathan J Winans; Matthew Morris; Stephen Doyle; Adam Fry; Susan M Fiore; Sima Mofakham; Charles B Mikell
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-02-11

Review 7.  Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient.

Authors:  Shane Musick; Anthony Alberico
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Prognostic Value of Serum Procalcitonin Based Model in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Ruoran Wang; Yusi Hua; Min He; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-08-30

9.  Impact of Cushing's sign in the prehospital setting on predicting the need for immediate neurosurgical intervention in trauma patients: a nationwide retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yumoto; Toshiharu Mitsuhashi; Yasuaki Yamakawa; Atsuyoshi Iida; Nobuyuki Nosaka; Kohei Tsukahara; Hiromichi Naito; Atsunori Nakao
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Outcomes of patients undergoing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury with brain herniation: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhigang Lan; Seidu A Richard; Qiang Li; Cong Wu; Qiao Zhang; Ruiqi Chen; Chaohua Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.