Literature DB >> 25227018

Prognostic value of SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients without LN metastasis.

Ie Ryung Yoo1, Soo Kyo Chung1, Hye Lim Park1, Woo Hee Choi1, Young Kyoon Kim2, Kyo Young Lee3, Young-Pil Wang4.   

Abstract

This paper aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the primary tumor on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan in early stage non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) patients without lymph node (LN) metastasis. In the experiment, eighty NSCLC patients pathologically staged as T1N0 or T2N0 were included (M:F=50:30; mean age, 64.8 years). All patients had preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan and curative surgery. FDG uptake in the primary tumor was measured by SUVmax and MTV with various SUV threshold values. SUVmax, MTV of the primary tumor, age, tumor size, histology and differentiation grade were analyzed for association with disease-free survival (DFS). The experimental results showed that the histology types included adenocarcinoma (n=58), squamous cell carcinoma (n=20), and others (n=2); Twenty-two (27.5%) of the 80 patients had a recurrence during follow-up at a median time of 29.1 months; The median SUVmax was 5.26, and the median MTV2.5 was 2.2 cm(3). Univariate analysis showed higher SUVmax (>4), greater MTV (MTV2.5 >4 cm(3)), and non-squamous histology were significantly associated with shorter period DFS (p=0.001, p=0.030 and p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, higher SUVmax (p=0.004) and adenocarcinoma histology (p=0.005) were associated with shorter DFS. Therefore, high SUVmax (>4) of the primary tumor on preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan is an independent prognostic factor of shorter DFS in early stage of NSCLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-small-cell lung cancer; PET/CT; early stage; metabolic tumor volume; standardized uptake value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227018     DOI: 10.3233/BME-141131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of prognostic values of primary tumor and nodal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in non-small cell lung cancer with N1 disease.

Authors:  Chae Hong Lim; Seung Hyup Hyun; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Tyler Bradshaw; Meiyappan Solaiyappan; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19

3.  Survival Prognostic Value of Morphological and Metabolic variables in Patients with Stage I and II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  L Domachevsky; D Groshar; R Galili; M Saute; H Bernstine
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Correlation Between Tumor Metabolism and Semiquantitative Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metrics in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sang Ho Lee; Andreas Rimner; Emily Gelb; Joseph O Deasy; Margie A Hunt; John L Humm; Neelam Tyagi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  SUVmax to tumor perimeter distance: a robust radiomics prognostic biomarker in resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño; Ana Maria García Vicente; Jesús J Bosque; Mariano Amo-Salas; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Antonio Francisco Honguero-Martinez; Víctor M Pérez-García; Ángel María Soriano Castrejón
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  18F FDG-PET/CT analysis of spread through air spaces (STAS) in clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Miki Nishimori; Hitomi Iwasa; Kana Miyatake; Noriko Nitta; Kosuke Nakaji; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Tomoaki Yamanishi; Rika Yoshimatsu; Mituko Iguchi; Masaya Tamura; Takuji Yamagami
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.258

7.  Difference in Postsurgical Prognostic Factors between Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Haruhiko Nakamura; Hiroki Sakai; Hiroyuki Kimura; Tomoyuki Miyazawa; Hideki Marushima; Hisashi Saji
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 8.  Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Min Dong; Xiaorong Sun; Wenwu Li; Ligang Xing; Jinming Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relation between tumor FDG uptake and hematologic prognostic indicators in stage I lung cancer patients following curative resection.

Authors:  Eugene Jeong; Seung Hyup Hyun; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Byung-Tae Kim; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression and 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Minghui Zhang; Dalong Wang; Qi Sun; Haihong Pu; Yan Wang; Shu Zhao; Yan Wang; Qiangyuan Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.