| Literature DB >> 25226586 |
Olivier Flores1, Bruno Hérault2, Matthieu Delcamp3, Éric Garnier4, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury3.
Abstract
How tropical tree species respond to disturbance is a central issue of forest eEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25226586 PMCID: PMC4165593 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Ecological and data models.
a) Hierarchical theoretical relationships between Performance currency [3] measured at population level and indicative of species performance, Demographic parameters measured at population level and indicative of population dynamics, and Species functional traits measured at individual level and indicative of species strategies [4]. b) Data model: variables used to quantify the components of the ecological model. Performance is evaluated by the population change rate, ; population dynamics is evaluated by recruitment and mortality rates; seven functional traits are considered in relation with the LHS scheme [9]. Gray and white boxes indicate variables measured in disturbed and control conditions, respectively.
Figure 2Results of the Bayesian Network analysis.
Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) showing the network of relationships between the population growth rate (), demographic parameters (, recruitment rate, , mortality rate) and functional traits (see main text for labels). Grey (white) indicates variables measured after disturbance (in control conditions). Dashed boxes indicate variables having no parent (explicative variable) in the network: SV, WD, LNC and . The figure represents a statistical summary of the inferred relationships. Numbers indicate the posterior estimates of the model parameters: the intercept and the proportion of variance explained by the parents (r2; see relation 1) are given in boxes, the regression coefficients () are shown on arrows. Arrow width is proportional to the corresponding standardized regression coefficient. Italic numbers are estimates of the residual variance (; see relation 1, to be compared with raw variances in Table S3 in Appendix S1).
Figure 3Correlation analysis.
Relationships between population change rate () and demographic parameters (, ) after disturbance and functional traits measured in control conditions (see main text for labels definition). Panels show respectively variables distribution in the diagonal, pairwise connections with lines showing linear regressions in the top triangle, and Spearman correlation coefficients on rank with tests results in the lower triangle. Large numbers indicate significant correlations with p-values as follows: . , , , and SV were log-transformed.