Literature DB >> 25226547

Rare, but obviously there: effects of target frequency and salience on visual search accuracy.

Adam T Biggs1, Stephen H Adamo2, Stephen R Mitroff2.   

Abstract

Accuracy can be extremely important for many visual search tasks. However, numerous factors work to undermine successful search. Several negative influences on search have been well studied, yet one potentially influential factor has gone almost entirely unexplored-namely, how is search performance affected by the likelihood that a specific target might appear? A recent study demonstrated that when specific targets appear infrequently (i.e., once in every thousand trials) they were, on average, not often found. Even so, some infrequently appearing targets were actually found quite often, suggesting that the targets' frequency is not the only factor at play. Here, we investigated whether salience (i.e., the extent to which an item stands out during search) could explain why some infrequent targets are easily found whereas others are almost never found. Using the mobile application Airport Scanner, we assessed how individual target frequency and salience interacted in a visual search task that included a wide array of targets and millions of trials. Target frequency and salience were both significant predictors of search accuracy, although target frequency explained more of the accuracy variance. Further, when examining only the rarest target items (those that appeared on less than 0.15% of all trials), there was a significant relationship between salience and accuracy such that less salient items were less likely to be found. Beyond implications for search theory, these data suggest significant vulnerability for real-world searches that involve targets that are both infrequent and hard-to-spot.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Rare-target search; Salience; Target frequency; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25226547     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  5 in total

1.  Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The influence of category representativeness on the low prevalence effect in visual search.

Authors:  Ryan E O'Donnell; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-22

Review 3.  Automated pose estimation in primates.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Hyun Soo Park; Jan Zimmermann
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.014

4.  Prior experience with target encounter affects attention allocation and prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Kara N Moore; James Michael Lampinen; Eryn J Adams; Blake L Nesmith; Presley Burch
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-07

5.  Feedback moderates the effect of prevalence on perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Wanyi Lyu; David E Levari; Makaela S Nartker; Daniel S Little; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.