Literature DB >> 25225681

Knotted versus knotless suture bridge repair of the achilles tendon insertion: a biomechanical study.

Joseph T Cox1, Peter L Shorten2, Gregory C Gould2, Ronald J Markert2, Michael D Barnett2, Richard T Laughlin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy often involves detachment and debridement of the Achilles tendon insertion. A recent study has shown that knotted suture bridge fixation of the Achilles to the calcaneus is biomechanically superior to single-row fixation, but there is an absence of literature on the use of different suture bridge constructs to repair the Achilles tendon. HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in the load to failure, mode of failure, tendon strain, tendon stiffness, repair site gapping, or footprint size when comparing knotted suture bridge repair to knotless suture bridge repair of the Achilles tendon after detachment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: A single specimen from each pair of 10 cadaveric Achilles tendons was randomized to 1 of 2 Achilles insertion repair groups: knotted (n = 10) or knotless (n = 10) suture bridge repair. Repaired footprint size was measured, and then cyclic testing from 10 to 100 N for 2000 cycles was performed. This was followed by measurement of tendon strain, repair site displacement, load to failure, and tendon stiffness.
RESULTS: The knotted suture bridge repair had a significantly higher load to failure compared with the knotless suture bridge (mean ± SD, 317.8 ± 93.6 N vs 196.1 ± 12.1 N, respectively; P = .001). All constructs failed at the tendon-suture interface. Tendon strain after cyclic testing was significantly greater in the knotless (1.20 ± 1.05) compared with the knotted (0.39 ± 0.4) suture repair groups (P = .011). There was no significant difference in footprint size between the knotted (230.3 ± 63.3 mm(2)) and knotless (248.5 ± 48.8 mm(2)) groups (P = .40). There was also no significant difference in stiffness (knotted = 76.4 ± 8.0 N/mm; knotless = 69.6 ± 10.9 N/mm; P = .17) and repair site displacement after cyclic testing (knotted = 2.8 ± 1.2 mm; knotless = 3.6 ± 1.1 mm; P = .17).
CONCLUSION: During suture bridge repair of the Achilles tendon after detachment, knots at the proximal suture anchors significantly improve the biomechanical strength of the repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrated that the knotless suture bridge repair had a significantly lower load to failure than the knotted suture bridge. Surgeons should be aware of these biomechanical differences, as they influence the postoperative rehabilitation protocol and may lead to higher surgical complication rates.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  insertional Achilles tendinopathy; repair; suture anchor; suture bridge

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225681     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514549004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  3 in total

1.  The elastic capacity of a tendon-repair construct influences the force necessary to induce gapping.

Authors:  Atesch Ateschrang; Christoph Salewski; Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Anna Janine Schreiner; Michael T Hirschmann; Ulrich Stöckle; Sufian S Ahmad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Suture-Only Repair Versus Suture Anchor-Augmented Repair for Achilles Tendon Ruptures With a Short Distal Stump: A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Michael A Boin; Matthew A Dorweiler; Christopher J McMellen; Gregory C Gould; Richard T Laughlin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-04

3.  Biomechanical Comparison of Panda Rope Bridge Technique and Other Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques In Vitro.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Yuan Mu; Yulei Diao; Wenke Liu; Yahong Wu; Zhuoqun Wang; Yanfeng Luo; Yangli Xie; Liangjun Yin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.