Stéphanie Belloc1, Martine Cohen-Bacrie1, Edouard Amar2, Vincent Izard3, Moncef Benkhalifa4, Alain Dalléac1, Jacques de Mouzon5. 1. Laboratoire Eylau Unilabs, Paris, France. 2. Clinique de la Muette, Paris, France. 3. Clinique Pierre Chérest, Neuilly sur Seine, France. 4. Service de Biologie de la Reproduction et Cytogénétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens, France. 5. INSERM, Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin Port Royal, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction, Paris, France. Electronic address: jacques.de-mouzon@inserm.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on semen characteristics. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Single private andrology laboratory. PATIENT(S): All patients (n=10,665) consulting for a semen analysis from October 9, 2010, to October 8, 2011. When analyses were repeated on the same patient, only the first was included. INTERVENTION(S): Recording of self-reported weight and height and of semen analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All parameters of standard semen analysis: pH, volume, sperm concentration per mL, total sperm count per ejaculate, motility (%) within 1 hour after ejaculation (overall and progressive), viability (%), and normal sperm morphology (%). Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were applied, and results are given either with mean±SD, or 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. RESULT(S): Semen volume decreased from 3.3±1.6 to 2.7±1.6 mL when BMI increased from normal (20-25 kg/m2) to extreme obesity (>40 kg/m2). The same was true for semen concentration (56.4±54.9 to 39.4±51.0 million/mL), total sperm count (171±170 to 92±95 million), and progressive motility (36.9±16.8% to 34.7±17.1%). The percentage of cases with azoospermia and cryptozoospermia increased from 1.9% to 9.1% and from 4.7% to 15.2%, respectively. The other semen characteristics were not affected. Multivariate models including age and abstinence duration confirmed these results. CONCLUSION(S): In this study, on a large patient sample size, increased BMI was associated with decreased semen quality, affecting volume, concentration, and motility. The percentage of normal forms was not decreased.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on semen characteristics. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Single private andrology laboratory. PATIENT(S): All patients (n=10,665) consulting for a semen analysis from October 9, 2010, to October 8, 2011. When analyses were repeated on the same patient, only the first was included. INTERVENTION(S): Recording of self-reported weight and height and of semen analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All parameters of standard semen analysis: pH, volume, sperm concentration per mL, total sperm count per ejaculate, motility (%) within 1 hour after ejaculation (overall and progressive), viability (%), and normal sperm morphology (%). Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were applied, and results are given either with mean±SD, or 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. RESULT(S): Semen volume decreased from 3.3±1.6 to 2.7±1.6 mL when BMI increased from normal (20-25 kg/m2) to extreme obesity (>40 kg/m2). The same was true for semen concentration (56.4±54.9 to 39.4±51.0 million/mL), total sperm count (171±170 to 92±95 million), and progressive motility (36.9±16.8% to 34.7±17.1%). The percentage of cases with azoospermia and cryptozoospermia increased from 1.9% to 9.1% and from 4.7% to 15.2%, respectively. The other semen characteristics were not affected. Multivariate models including age and abstinence duration confirmed these results. CONCLUSION(S): In this study, on a large patient sample size, increased BMI was associated with decreased semen quality, affecting volume, concentration, and motility. The percentage of normal forms was not decreased.
Authors: Jorunn M Andersen; Hilde Herning; Elin L Aschim; Jøran Hjelmesæth; Tom Mala; Hans Ivar Hanevik; Mona Bungum; Trine B Haugen; Oliwia Witczak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240