Literature DB >> 25225056

Global cost-effectiveness of GDM screening and management: current knowledge and future needs.

Louise K K Weile1, James G Kahn2, Elliot Marseille3, Dorte M Jensen4, Peter Damm5, Nicolai Lohse6.   

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasing cause of morbidity in women and their offspring. Screening and intervention can reduce perinatal and most likely also long-term diabetes consequences. There have been many economic studies, but not recently systematically compared. We conducted a systematic search and abstraction of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies from 2002 to 2014. We standardized all findings to 2014 US dollars. We found that cost-effectiveness ratios varied widely. Most variation was found to be due to differences in geographic setting, diagnostic criteria and intervention approaches, and outcomes (e.g., inclusion or exclusion of long-term type 2 diabetes risk and associated costs). We concluded that incorporation of long-term benefits of GDM screening and treatment has huge impact on cost-effectiveness estimates. Based on the large methodological heterogeneity and varying results in the existing body of evidence, we find it unreasonable to outline any global recommendations. For future economic studies, we recommend inclusion of long-term outcomes and adaptation to local preferences, as well as examination of the impact of the diagnostic criteria recently proposed by the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; gestational diabetes mellitus; health economic evaluation; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225056     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  10 in total

1.  Evolution of maternal and neonatal outcomes before and after the adoption of the IADPSG/WHO guidelines in Belgium: A descriptive study of 444,228 pregnancies.

Authors:  Philippe Oriot; Charlotte Leroy; Virginie Van Leeuw; Jean Christophe Philips; Jean François Vanderijst; Aline Vuckovic; Elena Costa; Christian Debauche; Frederic Chantraine
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Application of One-Step IADPSG Versus Two-Step Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes in the Real World: Impact on Health Services, Clinical Care, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Florence M Brown; Jennifer Wyckoff
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Controversies and Advances in Gestational Diabetes-An Update in the Era of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Marina P Carreiro; Anelise I Nogueira; Antonio Ribeiro-Oliveira
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  The Impact of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz; Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi; Samira Behboudi-Gandevani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The Cost of Prenatal Care Services in the City of Aydın: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Safiye Özvurmaz; Zekiye Karaçam; Vesile Ünay
Journal:  Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  Varicella in Poland: economic burden in children 1-12 years of age in Poland, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Jacek Wysocki; Ilona Malecka; Joanna Stryczynska-Kazubska; Emmanouil Rampakakis; Barbara Kuter; Lara J Wolfson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Meena Bhatia; Lucy H Mackillop; Katy Bartlett; Lise Loerup; Yvonne Kenworthy; Jonathan C Levy; Andrew J Farmer; Carmelo Velardo; Lionel Tarassenko; Jane E Hirst
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Cost effectiveness of different screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus screening: study protocol of a randomized community non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.320

9.  Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden - a stepped wedge national cluster randomised controlled trial - the CDC4G study protocol.

Authors:  Helena Fadl; Maryam Saeedi; Scott Montgomery; Anders Magnuson; Erik Schwarcz; Kerstin Berntorp; Verena Sengpiel; Elisabeth Storck-Lindholm; Helena Strevens; Anna-Karin Wikström; Sophia Brismar-Wendel; Martina Persson; Stefan Jansson; Fredrik Ahlsson; Carina Ursing; Linda Ryen; Kerstin Petersson; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Karin Hildén; David Simmons
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Economic burden of IADPSG gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria in China: propensity score matching analysis from a 7-year retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Zonglin He; Yuan Tang; Huatao Xie; Yuchen Lin; Shangqiang Liang; Yuyuan Xu; Zhili Chen; Liang-Zhi Wu; Jie Sheng; Xiaoyu Bi; Muyi Pang; Babatunde Akinwunmi; Xiaomin Xiao; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.