Literature DB >> 25224838

Sonography of the normal lung: Comparison between young and elderly subjects.

Anna Maria Chiesa1, Federica Ciccarese1, Greta Gardelli2, Ugo Maria Regina2, Francesco Feletti3, Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani1, Maurizio Zompatori1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The senile lung undergoes physiologic changes that are well known but have not been investigated with ultrasound (US). Thus, the aim of our study was to compare the US appearances of the lungs in a group of healthy, nonsmoker elderly subjects with those in a group of young subjects.
METHODS: One hundred elderly subjects older than 65 years of age (mean age ± SD, 79 ± 7 years) and 50 younger subjects less than 56 years of age (mean age ± SD, 33 ± 12) underwent US examination of the lungs. We analyzed the anterior, midlateral, and posterobasal surface of each lung to evaluate the presence or absence of A-lines and B-lines. Fisher's exact test and Pearson's χ2 test were used to compare the findings in the two groups.
RESULTS: A-lines were absent in 94/100 (94%) elderly subjects versus 2/50 (4%) young subjects (p < 0.0001). B-lines were found in 37/100 (37%) elderly subjects: ≤3 lines per field of view in 27/37 (73%); >3 lines in 2/37 (5%); both ≤3 lines and >3 lines (depending on the region scanned) in 8/37 (22%). In contrast, only in 5/50 (10%) young subjects were B-lines visible (≤3 lines per field of view in all cases [p < 0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the elderly subjects did not have A-lines, and B-lines were observed in a high percentage. The reduction of impedance between lung parenchyma and soft tissues of the chest wall and the increased thickness of interlobular septa might explain these results.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 43:230-234, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  A-lines; B-lines; elderly subjects; lung; normal anatomy; ultrasonography

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224838     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  6 in total

1.  The prevalence of lung surface abnormalities in a healthy population as detected by a screening lung ultrasound protocol: Comparison between young and older volunteers.

Authors:  Elissa Raya Zoneff; Kylie Baker; Amy Sweeny; Gerben Keijzers; Jenni Sanderson; Stuart Watkins
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 2.  Lung B-line artefacts and their use.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Gebhard Mathis; Michael Blaivas; Giovanni Volpicelli; Armin Seibel; Daniel Wastl; Nathan S S Atkinson; Xin-Wu Cui; Mei Fan; Dong Yi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Usefulness of lung ultrasound B-lines in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: a literature review.

Authors:  YuKai Wang; Luna Gargani; Tatiana Barskova; Dan E Furst; Marco Matucci Cerinic
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Lung Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia: Not Always and Not Only What Is COVID-19 "Glitters".

Authors:  Carla Maria Irene Quarato; Antonio Mirijello; Michele Maria Maggi; Cristina Borelli; Raffaele Russo; Donato Lacedonia; Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro; Giulia Scioscia; Pasquale Tondo; Gaetano Rea; Annalisa Simeone; Beatrice Feragalli; Valentina Massa; Antonio Greco; Salvatore De Cosmo; Marco Sperandeo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-19

5.  A-lines and B-lines in patients with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Øyvind Johannessen; Brian Claggett; Eldrin F Lewis; John D Groarke; Varsha Swamy; Moritz Lindner; Scott D Solomon; Elke Platz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2021-10-27

6.  Feasibility of using point-of-care lung ultrasound for early triage of COVID-19 patients in the emergency room.

Authors:  Nick Narinx; Annick Smismans; Rolf Symons; Johan Frans; Annick Demeyere; Marc Gillis
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-09-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.