Literature DB >> 25224716

'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants': Recontextualization in Writing from Sources.

Yongyan Li1.   

Abstract

Despite calls for more research into the writing expertise of senior scientists, the literature reveals surprisingly little about the writing strategies of successful scientist writers. The present paper addresses the gap in the literature by reporting a study that investigated the note-taking strategies of an expert writer, a Chinese professor of biochemistry. Primarily based on interview data, the paper describes the expert's recontextualization (Linell, Text 18:143-157, 1998) strategies at three levels: 'accumulating writing materials' by modifying source texts, composing from 'collections' of cut-and-pasted chunks in drafting a review article, and adopting reusable citations in sources as a 'map'. It is emphasized that through repeatedly revising his paper in light of his rhetorical intentions in a new context of meaning, the expert writer would maximally recontextualize the source-based text segments and citations in the paper, averting transgressive intertextuality (Chandrasoma et al., J Lang Identity Educ 3:171-193, 2004) as a result. The paper ends by highlighting the pedagogical implications of the study for English for Professional Academic Purposes (EPAP).

Keywords:  English as an additional language (EAL) authors; Expert scientist writers; Note-taking strategies; Plagiarism in scientific publishing; Recontextualization in writing from sources

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224716     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9590-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?

Authors:  G H Whitehouse
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Plagiarism pinioned.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A tale of two citations.

Authors:  Mounir Errami; Harold Garner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism.

Authors:  Tara C Long; Mounir Errami; Angela C George; Zhaohui Sun; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  As I said before... .

Authors:  Barbara A Gilchrest; Elizabeth N Blalock
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Plagiarism: words and ideas.

Authors:  Mathieu Bouville
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 7.  Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing.

Authors:  Allen H Renear; Carole L Palmer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Plagiarism? No, we're just borrowing better English.

Authors:  Ihsan Yilmaz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chinese researchers debate rash of plagiarism cases.

Authors:  X Li; L Xiong
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.

Authors:  Yongyan Li
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  1 in total

1.  Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.

Authors:  Cary Moskovitz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.