Literature DB >> 25224654

Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable sinus implants in the office setting: a prospective case series.

Keith E Matheny1, Kenny B Carter, Ewen Y Tseng, Karen J Fong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can be compromised by postoperative inflammation, recurrent polyposis, middle turbinate lateralization, and synechiae, often requiring subsequent interventions. A bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implant placed in the operating room following ESS has been proven safe and effective in 2 randomized controlled trials and a subsequent meta-analysis, for its ability to preserve sinus patency, and reduce medical and surgical interventions. This trial sought to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of implants placed in the office after achieving hemostasis.
METHODS: Twenty patients with CRS underwent ESS including bilateral ethmoidectomy. A steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implant was deployed into each ethmoid cavity in the office within 7 days after ESS. Endoscopic appearance of the ethmoid cavities was evaluated at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks postoperatively by the operating surgeon and an independent blinded evaluator. Procedural tolerance was assessed at week 2 using a patient preference questionnaire. The 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) questionnaire was completed at baseline, week 2, and week 4.
RESULTS: In-office placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implants was well tolerated, with 90% of patients very satisfied with the overall experience, and 80% very satisfied with the recovery process. At 1 month, there were no significant adhesions or frank polyposis, and middle turbinate lateralization was only 5%. Compared to baseline, ethmoid sinus inflammation was significantly reduced (p = 0.03), and the mean SNOT-20 score was significantly improved (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In-office placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implants after achieving hemostasis was well tolerated and might improve local drug diffusion and surgical outcomes.
© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adhesions; bioabsorbable implant; corticosteroid; endoscopic sinus surgery; inflammation; local anesthesia; nasal polyps; office surgery; oral steroids; steroid releasing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224654     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  3 in total

1.  [Guideline for "rhinosinusitis"-long version : S2k guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians and the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; A Beule; D Jobst; L Klimek; M Laudien; M Lell; T J Vogl; U Popert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Design and characterization of plasticized bacterial cellulose/waterborne polyurethane composite with antibacterial function for nasal stenting.

Authors:  Zhaoxuan Feng; Minglu Li; Xing Jin; Yudong Zheng; Junxiu Liu; Liang Zhao; Yansen Wang; Hao Li; Danlin Zuo
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Bioabsorbable steroid-releasing sinus implants in the frontal and maxillary sinuses: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Keith E Matheny
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.