Literature DB >> 25224397

How did that get there? A population-based analysis of nasal foreign bodies.

Peter F Svider1, Anthony Sheyn, Elana Folbe, Vibhav Sekhsaria, Giancarlo Zuliani, Jean Anderson Eloy, Adam J Folbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to calculate nationwide incidence of emergency department (ED) visits for nasal foreign bodies, identify the most frequently encountered consumer products, and evaluate outcomes and demographic trends.
METHODS: The Nationwide Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was evaluated for ED visits related to nasal foreign bodies for the most recent 5-year span available. Nationwide incidence was calculated, and the most frequent foreign bodies were identified and organized by demographics including age and gender.
RESULTS: A total of 6418 entries extrapolated to an estimated 198,566 ED visits nationwide were found. Out of individual case entries evaluated, median patient age was 3 years, and 42.7% of patients were male. Ninety-six percent (96.4%) of patients were released after examination/treatment. Jewelry beads comprised a plurality of nasal foreign bodies, followed by paper products and toys. Patients with nasal foreign bodies involving toys, building sets, pens/pencils, batteries, coins, and nails/screws were predominantly male, whereas patients with nasal foreign bodies involving jewelry, paper products, and buttons were predominantly female. Jewelry was the most common item for patients in most age groups; age-specific differences in the composition of remaining nasal foreign bodies were noted.
CONCLUSION: A variety of consumer products carry inherent risks for becoming nasal foreign bodies, with nearly 200,000 ED visits over a 5-year period. Jewelry beads, paper products, and toys were the most common products noted. Speedy recognition and retrieval of these items and other objects noted is imperative for avoidance of deleterious sequelae. Demographic-specific trends noted and organized by age and gender may be an invaluable adjunct for patient history-taking and clinical examination.
© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumer product safety; foreign bodies; jewelry foreign bodies; nasal foreign bodies; national electronic injury surveillance system

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224397     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  4 in total

1.  Traumatic Facial Injuries Among Elderly Nursing Home Residents: Never Event or Frequent Occurrence?

Authors:  Michael Bobian; Nour El-Kashlan; Curtis J Hanba; Peter F Svider; Adam J Folbe; Jean Anderson Eloy; Giancarlo F Zuliani; Michael Carron
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Will children ever learn? Removal of nasal and aural foreign bodies: a study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  S Morris; M S Osborne; A L McDermott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Presentation and management of nasal foreign bodies in a Chinese metro area.

Authors:  Shang Yan; Nan Zeng; Guowei Chen; Yongchao Chen; Zebin Wu; Hongguang Pan; Yishu Teng; Xiangyu Ma; Lan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  The art of removing nasal foreign bodies.

Authors:  Tian-Tee Ng; Michael Nasserallah
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.