Literature DB >> 25224212

Polymerase ɛ (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing.

Caroline C Billingsley1, David E Cohn, David G Mutch, Julie A Stephens, Adrian A Suarez, Paul J Goodfellow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DNA polymerase ɛ (POLE) exonuclease domain mutations characterize a subtype of endometrial cancer (EC) with a markedly increased somatic mutational burden. POLE-mutant tumors were described as a molecular subtype with improved progression-free survival by The Cancer Genome Atlas. In this study, the frequency, spectrum, prognostic significance, and potential clinical application of POLE mutations were investigated in patients with endometrioid EC.
METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction amplification and Sanger sequencing were used to test for POLE mutations in 544 tumors. Correlations between demographic, survival, clinicopathologic, and molecular features were investigated. Statistical tests were 2-sided.
RESULTS: Thirty POLE mutations (5.6%) were identified. Mutations were associated with younger age (<60 years; P=.001). POLE mutations were detected in tumors with microsatellite stability (MSS) and microsatellite instability (MSI) at similar frequencies (5.9% and 5.2%, respectively) and were most common in tumors with MSI that lacked mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation (P<.001). There was no association with progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.22; P=.127).
CONCLUSIONS: The discovery that mutations occur with equal frequency in MSS and MSI tumors and are most frequent in MSI tumors lacking MLH1 methylation has implications for Lynch syndrome screening and mutation testing. The current results indicate that POLE mutations are associated with somatic mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes in a subset of tumors. The absence of an association between POLE mutation and progression-free survival indicates that POLE mutation status is unlikely to be a clinically useful prognostic marker. However, POLE testing in MSI ECs could serve as a marker of somatic disease origin. Therefore, POLE tumor testing may be a valuable exclusionary criterion for Lynch syndrome gene testing.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA mismatch repair; Lynch syndrome; endometrial cancer; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224212      PMCID: PMC4304930          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

1.  COBRA: a sensitive and quantitative DNA methylation assay.

Authors:  Z Xiong; P W Laird
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Use of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry testing for the identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Linnea M Baudhuin; Lawrence J Burgart; Olga Leontovich; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The 3'-->5' exonucleases of both DNA polymerases delta and epsilon participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Morrison; A Sugino
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-02

4.  MLH1 promoter methylation and gene silencing is the primary cause of microsatellite instability in sporadic endometrial cancers.

Authors:  S B Simpkins; T Bocker; E M Swisher; D G Mutch; D J Gersell; A J Kovatich; J P Palazzo; R Fishel; P J Goodfellow
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 5.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C R Boland; S N Thibodeau; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J R Eshleman; R W Burt; S J Meltzer; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; R Fodde; G N Ranzani; S Srivastava
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Eukaryotic DNA polymerase amino acid sequence required for 3'----5' exonuclease activity.

Authors:  A Morrison; J B Bell; T A Kunkel; A Sugino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells.

Authors:  R Parsons; G M Li; M J Longley; W H Fang; N Papadopoulos; J Jen; A de la Chapelle; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; P Modrich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Microsatellite instability and epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 and outcome of patients with endometrial carcinomas of the endometrioid type.

Authors:  Israel Zighelboim; Paul J Goodfellow; Feng Gao; Randall K Gibb; Matthew A Powell; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is associated with the microsatellite instability phenotype in sporadic endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  M Esteller; R Levine; S B Baylin; L H Ellenson; J G Herman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1998-11-05       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Distinction of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer through quantification of MLH1 methylation by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Marcus Bettstetter; Stephan Dechant; Petra Ruemmele; Monika Grabowski; Gisela Keller; Elke Holinski-Feder; Arndt Hartmann; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Wolfgang Dietmaier
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  65 in total

1.  Molecular-based classification algorithm for endometrial carcinoma categorizes ovarian endometrioid carcinoma into prognostically significant groups.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Bin Xu; Sam Khalouei; Dina Bassiouny; Matthew Cesari; Nadia Ismiil; Sharon Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Immune Microenvironment in Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers: Hereditary or Sporadic Origin Matters.

Authors:  Janelle B Pakish; Qian Zhang; Zhongyuan Chen; Han Liang; Gary B Chisholm; Ying Yuan; Samuel C Mok; Russell R Broaddus; Karen H Lu; Melinda S Yates
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Molecular staging of gynecological cancer: What is the future?

Authors:  Pratibha S Binder; Jaime Prat; David G Mutch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  An NRG Oncology/GOG study of molecular classification for risk prediction in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Craig M Rush; Heather A Lankes; William T Creasman; David S Miller; Nilsa C Ramirez; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Cynthia Timmers; Adrian A Suarez; Richard J Zaino; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Valerie Lee; Adrian Murphy; Dung T Le; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 6.  Leveraging immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancers in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Dmitriy Zamarin; Amir A Jazaeri
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Polymerase ε (POLE) ultra-mutation in uterine tumors correlates with T lymphocyte infiltration and increased resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in vitro.

Authors:  Stefania Bellone; Eliana Bignotti; Silvia Lonardi; Francesca Ferrari; Floriana Centritto; Alice Masserdotti; Francesca Pettinella; Jonathan Black; Gulden Menderes; Gary Altwerger; Pei Hui; Salvatore Lopez; Christopher de Haydu; Elena Bonazzoli; Federica Predolini; Luca Zammataro; Emiliano Cocco; Federico Ferrari; Antonella Ravaggi; Chiara Romani; Fabio Facchetti; Enrico Sartori; Franco E Odicino; Dan-Arin Silasi; Babak Litkouhi; Elena Ratner; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Primum non nocere: Are we ready for POLE testing in endometrial cancer?

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David E Cohn; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Estrogen receptor-alpha as a predictive biomarker in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Floor J Backes; Christopher J Walker; Paul J Goodfellow; Erinn M Hade; Garima Agarwal; David Mutch; David E Cohn; Adrian A Suarez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  MonoSeq Variant Caller Reveals Novel Mononucleotide Run Indel Mutations in Tumors with Defective DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  Christopher J Walker; Mario A Miranda; Matthew J O'Hern; James S Blachly; Cassandra L Moyer; Jennifer Ivanovich; Karl W Kroll; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Caroline E Sapp; David G Mutch; David E Cohn; Ralf Bundschuh; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.