Literature DB >> 25224001

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

V Ramos-Martín1, S Paulus2, S Siner2, E Scott2, K Padmore2, P Newland2, R J Drew2, T W Felton3, F Docobo-Pérez4, B Pizer5, F Pea6, M Peak2, M A Turner7, M W Beresford5, W W Hope8.   

Abstract

Teicoplanin is frequently administered to treat Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients. However, not enough is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin in children to justify the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to determine the population PK of teicoplanin in children and evaluate the current dosage regimens. A PK hospital-based study was conducted. Current dosage recommendations were used for children up to 16 years of age. Thirty-nine children were recruited. Serum samples were collected at the first dose interval (1, 3, 6, and 24 h) and at steady state. A standard 2-compartment PK model was developed, followed by structural models that incorporated weight. Weight was allowed to affect clearance (CL) using linear and allometric scaling terms. The linear model best accounted for the observed data and was subsequently chosen for Monte Carlo simulations. The PK parameter medians/means (standard deviation [SD]) were as follows: CL, [0.019/0.023 (0.01)] × weight liters/h/kg of body weight; volume, 2.282/4.138 liters (4.14 liters); first-order rate constant from the central to peripheral compartment (Kcp), 0.474/3.876 h(-1) (8.16 h(-1)); and first-order rate constant from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc), 0.292/3.994 h(-1) (8.93 h(-1)). The percentage of patients with a minimum concentration of drug in serum (Cmin) of <10 mg/liter was 53.85%. The median/mean (SD) total population area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 619/527.05 mg · h/liter (166.03 mg · h/liter). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, only 30.04% (median AUC, 507.04 mg · h/liter), 44.88% (494.1 mg · h/liter), and 60.54% (452.03 mg · h/liter) of patients weighing 50, 25, and 10 kg, respectively, attained trough concentrations of >10 mg/liter by day 4 of treatment. The teicoplanin population PK is highly variable in children, with a wider AUC distribution spread than for adults. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be a routine requirement to minimize suboptimal concentrations. (This trial has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database Registry [EudraCT] under registration number 2012-005738-12.).
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224001      PMCID: PMC4249354          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.03685-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  29 in total

1.  Accurate detection of outliers and subpopulations with Pmetrics, a nonparametric and parametric pharmacometric modeling and simulation package for R.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Michael G van Guilder; Walter M Yamada; Alan Schumitzky; Roger W Jelliffe
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children.

Authors:  E Tarral; F Jehl; A Tarral; U Simeoni; H Monteil; D Willard; J Geisert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Exploration of optimal teicoplanin dosage based on pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of intensive care unit patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mao Hagihara; Takumi Umemura; Masao Kimura; Takeshi Mori; Takaaki Hasegawa; Hiroshige Mikamo
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.211

Review 4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in adults: a report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Kate Gould; David W Denning; Tom S J Elliott; Juliet Foweraker; John D Perry; Bernard D Prendergast; Jonathan A T Sandoe; Michael J Spry; Richard W Watkin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics in critically ill paediatric patients.

Authors:  A Sánchez; J López-Herce; E Cueto; A Carrillo; R Moral
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Glycopeptide antibiotics: from conventional molecules to new derivatives.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Yves Van Laethem; Patrice Courvalin; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Age- and gender-related differences in teicoplanin levels in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Volker Strenger; Nora Hofer; Siegfried Rödl; Martin Hönigl; Reinhard Raggam; Markus G Seidel; Hans Jürgen Dornbusch; Daniela Sperl; Herwig Lackner; Wolfgang Schwinger; Petra Sovinz; Martin Benesch; Berndt Urlesberger; Christian Urban
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Long-term trends in the epidemiology of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents.

Authors:  Agnes van den Hoogen; Leo J Gerards; Malgorzata A Verboon-Maciolek; André Fleer; Tannette G Krediet
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe, 1999-2002.

Authors:  Edine W Tiemersma; Stef L A M Bronzwaer; Outi Lyytikäinen; John E Degener; Paul Schrijnemakers; Nienke Bruinsma; Jos Monen; Wolfgang Witte; Hajo Grundman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Authors:  A Kontou; K Sarafidis; O Begou; H G Gika; A Tsiligiannis; K Ogungbenro; A Dokoumetzidis; E Agakidou; E Roilides
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in children with malignant haematological disease.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Daolun Zhang; Thomas Storme; André Baruchel; Xavier Declèves; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Nephrotoxicity of Teicoplanin Therapy in Chinese Children: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Tao Zhang; Jie Mi; Yuzhu Dong; Yang Liu; Ying Zhang; Di Zhang; Taotao Wang; Hua Cheng; Yalin Dong
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin in neonates: making better use of C-reactive protein to deliver individualized therapy.

Authors:  V Ramos-Martín; M N Neely; P McGowan; S Siner; K Padmore; M Peak; M W Beresford; M A Turner; S Paulus; W W Hope
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Optimization of Teicoplanin in Children With Different Renal Functions.

Authors:  Liuliu Gao; Hua Xu; Qi Ye; Sichan Li; Jun Wang; Yan Mei; Changhe Niu; Ting Kang; Chen Chen; Yang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Pediatric Patients with Normal versus Impaired Renal Function.

Authors:  Joon Sik Choi; Jong Min Kim; Dongsub Kim; Si Ho Kim; Heeyeon Cho; Hyung Doo Park; Soo Youn Lee; Cheol In Kang; Yae Jean Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Advances in Pediatric Pharmacology, Therapeutics, and Toxicology.

Authors:  Laura A Wang; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Adv Pediatr       Date:  2016-08

10.  Tools for the Individualized Therapy of Teicoplanin for Neonates and Children.

Authors:  V Ramos-Martín; M N Neely; K Padmore; M Peak; M W Beresford; M A Turner; S Paulus; J López-Herce; W W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.