Literature DB >> 25223626

Needlescopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer.

Toshiki Mukai1, Yosuke Fukunaga, Masashi Ueno, Satoshi Nagayama, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Riki Ono, Toshiharu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for colorectal cancers, but more minimally invasive surgery is continuously pursued. In June 2011, our institution started needlescopic surgery (NS). The aims of this study are to describe this technique and to investigate its feasibility for left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: From June 2011 to June 2013, 105 sigmoid colon and upper/middle rectal cancer patients underwent NS in our institution, involving one 5-mm port and three 3-mm ports, with the exception of an umbilical 12-mm port. A 10-mm scope is used through the umbilical 12-mm port, which will be extended to a small skin incision for specimen extraction. After dissection of the left colon, a 5-mm scope is inserted through the right lower 5-mm port and a linear stapler is inserted through the umbilical 12-mm port for rectal transection. The specimen is then extracted through umbilical incision, and the anastomosis is carried out by the double-staple technique.
RESULTS: TNM staging is stage 0/I/II/III/IV = 0/31/32/31/11. Fifty-one patients underwent sigmoidectomy and 54 patients underwent anterior resection. There was no conversion to open surgery, but one patient required a change to a 5-mm port from one of the 3-mm ports. Mean operating time was 193 min and mean estimated blood loss was 12 ml. There were ten (9 %) postoperative complications: two anastomotic leaks requiring reoperation, two anastomotic hemorrhages, and one wound infection. There was no mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: NS for left-sided colorectal cancer was a technically and oncologically feasible technique for selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25223626     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2007-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current status and prerequisites for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Hao Xu; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Minilaparoscopic colorectal resection: a preliminary experience and an outcomes comparison with classical laparoscopic colon procedures.

Authors:  Em Santoro; F Agresta; S Veltri; G Mulieri; N Bedin; M Mulieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Advances in cancer surgery: natural orifice surgery (NOTES) for oncological diseases.

Authors:  Erwin Rieder; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  J Holder-Murray; E J Dozois
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18

10.  Minilaparoscopic colorectal resections: technical note.

Authors:  S Bona; M Molteni; M Montorsi
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-03-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons.

Authors:  Hisanori Miki; Yosuke Fukunaga; Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Patient Body Image and Satisfaction with Surgical Wound Appearance After Reduced Port Surgery for Colorectal Diseases.

Authors:  Atsushi Hamabe; Ichiro Takemasa; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer ~a comparative study~.

Authors:  Masashi Tsuruta; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Koji Okabayashi; Kohei Shigeta; Takashi Ishida; Masashi Yahagi; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2018-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.