Literature DB >> 25223435

The problem of non-response in population surveys on the topic of HIV and sexuality: a comparative study.

Lisa Wallander1, Ronny H Tikkanen2, Louise Nilunger Mannheimer3, Per-Olof Östergren4, Lars Plantin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Throughout the Western world, response rates are falling in population surveys. The aim of the study was to explore for the presence of non-response bias in two Swedish research projects on HIV ['HIV in Sweden' (HIS11)] and sexuality ['Sex and health' (UngKAB09)].
METHODS: The study used four data sets (two from each project), each of which had been generated using different methods. By comparing means and percentages on 15 items across the data sets, we explore the potential presence of non-response bias due to interest in the survey topic (topic salience), and discuss the suitability of two increasingly common methods for recruiting respondents: the pre-recruited probability web panel and the self-selected web survey.
RESULTS: While a higher proportion of the respondents in the HIS11 substudies had been tested for HIV and were inclined to perceive themselves as being at high risk of HIV infection, the respondents in the UngKAB09 substudies were on average more sexually active. Further, while there was little variation in the results between the HIS11 substudies (postal/web survey and pre-recruited web panel), there were some fairly large differences in the results between the UngKAB09 substudies (web surveys, one of which was based on a self-selected sample).
CONCLUSION: The study concludes that (i) there are signs of non-response bias that may be due to topic salience, (ii) while care must be taken when using self-selection sampling methods, the pre-recruited probability web panel might provide a cost- and time-effective alternative for recruiting respondents in future population surveys.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25223435     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  6 in total

1.  Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?

Authors:  Kristin L Moilanen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-24

Review 2.  Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Cauane Blumenberg; Aluísio J D Barros
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Functional Constipation and Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome in the General Population: Data from the GECCO Study.

Authors:  Paul Enck; Johannes Leinert; Menno Smid; Thorsten Köhler; Juliane Schwille-Kiuntke
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Helping actions given and received in response to suicide risk: Findings from an Australian nationally representative telephone survey.

Authors:  Angela Nicholas; Jane Pirkis; Anthony Jorm; Matthew J Spittal; Nicola Reavley
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-09-13

5.  Effectiveness of modular approach in ensuring data quality in large-scale surveys: Evidence from National Family Health Survey - 4 (2015-2016).

Authors:  Shri Kant Singh; Santosh Kumar Sharma; Md Juel Rana; Akash Porwal; Laxmi Kant Dwivedi
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-10-04

6.  Short Versions of the Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for Yemeni Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation.

Authors:  Amal A M Alsanabani; Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof; Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan; Khalid Aldhorae; Helmi A Alyamani
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.