Literature DB >> 25223349

Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in relation to site, stage of the illness, reason for hospital admission, and mortality in patients with gynecological tumors.

Camila Santos Rodrigues1, Gabriela Villaça Chaves.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors related to the illness and to oncological treatment as determinants of the nutritional status of patients with gynecological tumors.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study; the group was composed of 146 women histopathologically shown to have gynecological tumors, at different stages of treatment, and hospitalized at the foremost centers for the prevention and treatment of cancer in Rio de Janeiro. To obtain a nutritional diagnosis, we used the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). We did multiple comparisons of the numeric variables between the three PG-SGA nutritional status-classification groups by performing Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. We used the Mann-Whitney test to compare numerical variables between two groups. We analyzed the associations between categorical variables by using either the chi-squared (χ (2)) test or Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Of the women, 62.4 % were found to be at nutritional risk or to have some level of malnourishment, being more associated with the reason for hospital admission and stage disease that properly to the tumor site. The median PG-SGA score was points, with 62.3 % of the group returning 9 or more points. Women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were found to be predominantly well nourished, and those with tumors in the ovary were more frequently diagnosed as being severely malnourished.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support early nutritional intervention in the population identified as being at greater nutritional risk, aiming to minimize the loss of muscle mass and body weight, as well as to improve symptoms management, thus helping to achieve better clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25223349     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2409-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

1.  Do adults change their lifestyle behaviors after a cancer diagnosis?

Authors:  Chris M Blanchard; Maxine M Denniston; Frank Baker; Stuart R Ainsworth; Kerry S Courneya; Danette M Hann; Dean H Gesme; Douglas Reding; Thomas Flynn; John S Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2003 May-Jun

Review 2.  Indications and limitations of the use of subjective global assessment in clinical practice: an update.

Authors:  M Cristina G Barbosa-Silva; Aluísio J D Barros
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Impact of cancer, type, site, stage and treatment on the nutritional status of patients.

Authors:  F Bozzetti; S Migliavacca; A Scotti; M G Bonalumi; D Scarpa; F Baticci; M Ammatuna; A Pupa; G Terno; C Sequeira; C Masserini; H Emanuelli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Nutritional evaluation of gynecologic cancer patients during initial diagnosis of their disease.

Authors:  J C Tunca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Systematic monitoring and treatment of physical symptoms to alleviate fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pleun J de Raaf; Cora de Klerk; Reinier Timman; Jan J V Busschbach; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal radiation injury: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Abobakr K Shadad; Frank J Sullivan; Joseph D Martin; Laurence J Egan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Nutritional status of patients with gynecologic and breast cancer.

Authors:  R Zorlini; A Akemi Abe Cairo; M Salete Costa Gurgel
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 8.  Nutritional intervention and quality of life in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  Mónica María Marín Caro; Alessandro Laviano; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bryan T Hennessy; Robert L Coleman; Maurie Markman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Can subjective global assessment of nutritional status predict survival in ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Pankaj G Vashi; Sadie L Dahlk; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.234

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nutritional status assessed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment is associated with toxicity to chemoradiotherapy in women with cervical cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Amanda Pereira Mota; Mariah Azevedo Aredes; Juliana De Oliveira Miguel; Gabriela Villaça Chaves
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.884

2.  Patient interpretation of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) Short Form.

Authors:  Trude R Balstad; Asta Bye; Cathrine Rs Jenssen; Tora S Solheim; Lene Thoresen; Kari Sand
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Nutritional status of cancer outpatients using scored patient generated subjective global assessment in two cancer treatment centers, Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Yvonne Opanga; Lydia Kaduka; Zipporah Bukania; Richard Mutisya; Ann Korir; Veronica Thuita; Moses Mwangi; Erastus Muniu; Charles Mbakaya
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2017-08-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.